#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Could someone please summarize today\'s hearing
Whoa, the sky isn't falling? He was wrong?
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Could someone please summarize today\'s hearing
[ QUOTE ]
I'll take $10 of that action, not cause I'm unconfident, just don't have a huge bank roll to wager on things I know very little about. But 10:50 I can't afford to pass up. Payable on your honor. The Fonzzz [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] You're on, but since we're talking about a significantly smaller amount relative to transactional costs, I'm only going to offer 4:1. PM me if we still have a deal. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Could someone please summarize today\'s hearing
[ QUOTE ]
The Fonz says "I'm predicting credit card deposits & HarrahsPoker.com by Thanksgiving" [/ QUOTE ] Man, I'd LOVE for you to be right here (and I'll even pay you $50 without a wager if you are), but jumping on this wagon would be the equivalent of believing everything Gaboon had to say this winter. Fight on, though. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Could someone please summarize today\'s hearing
Did it concern anyone else that Bachus' repeated claims that all internet gambling (except the ponies and lottos) is in fact illegal went totally unchallenged? It sounded to me like he asserted again and again and again that last years legislation confirmed the illegality of playing online. And no one said that last years law specifically regulates methods of financial transactions rather than online play generally.
|
|
|