Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:24 PM
jhill3535 jhill3535 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: My Front Porch Looking In
Posts: 908
Default Re: NL100 AK TPTK against donk

Isn't there a theorem that says that a turn Check Raise always beats 1 pair?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:32 PM
effang effang is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,489
Default Re: NL100 AK TPTK against donk

[ QUOTE ]
Isn't there a theorem that says that a turn Check Raise always beats 1 pair?

[/ QUOTE ]

there's also a theorem that says TPTK is good against 72 VPIP players. that's the thing, against these types of players, your variance increases significantly, but if they stay at the table long enough, so does your bankroll.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:58 PM
Small Fry Small Fry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 761
Default Re: NL100 AK TPTK against donk

[ QUOTE ]
I would base my decision on how agg and how intelligent the guy has been postflop. There's a difference between being loose, being aggressive, and being dumb. He check raised the turn after you fired two big shots - that's usually a strong hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

X2. I've seen a few guys play virtually ATC preflop and play well post. They get called non stop in situations like this because everyone assumes, based on preflop #'s that they're a total maniac. Answer the above and then make your decision, but I don't think it's an auto call.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-07-2007, 05:06 PM
Stonewalled Stonewalled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Turned into a Newt, better now
Posts: 769
Default Re: NL100 AK TPTK against donk

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would base my decision on how agg and how intelligent the guy has been postflop. There's a difference between being loose, being aggressive, and being dumb. He check raised the turn after you fired two big shots - that's usually a strong hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

X2. I've seen a few guys play virtually ATC preflop and play well post. They get called non stop in situations like this because everyone assumes, based on preflop #'s that they're a total maniac. Answer the above and then make your decision, but I don't think it's an auto call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay, let's assume this guy is a good post-flop player. What do you put him on after the flop?

Wouldn't we expect him to play made hands strongly on the flop to protect against the flush, and to get paid off by those who think he's fos?

Wouldn't we also expect him to play a strong flush draw/straight draw combo (say 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]) pretty fast on the flop?

We wouldn't expect him -- remember, we're assuming he's to be a good post-flop player here -- to call the flop with a gutshot, would we?

So, again, what do you put villain on that beats us, and why? Also, do you think he has that hand often enough (i.e., 2/3 of the time) to make a call by Hero incorrect?

(Fwiw, I think 2-pair made on the turn is the most likely hand Villain holds that beats Hero.)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-07-2007, 05:25 PM
Small Fry Small Fry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 761
Default Re: NL100 AK TPTK against donk

Good point. Maybe "play well" is not a good choice of words. He plays well from the standpoint that when he makes a big hand it is fairly obvious his opponent is representing a decent hand too so he knows that based on his style he can push and get called. He'll make bad calls not getting the correct pot odds. If he plays ATC and plays decent then presumably he is playing for implied odds. In this hand he could have hit any one of the flop cards and yes, even have 9,7. The Hero raised preflop and then C-bet. Pretty standard and at this point hero has either a king, possibly a pair over 8's or nothing, good spot to call to see what he does on the turn. Villian could even have a big hand (set) on the flop and wait for turn for Hero to really show strength before raising. If hero has nothing on flop hard for him to call any real raise / push (say hero had A,Q) but on the turn hero defines his hand further, or at least appears to do so as he could be firing a second barrel. At this point villian either had a big hand on the flop, got lucky on the turn, is on a draw (with a pair possibly) or has nothing. So I just think you should give it a little thought before hitting the call button.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-07-2007, 05:40 PM
Stonewalled Stonewalled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Turned into a Newt, better now
Posts: 769
Default Re: NL100 AK TPTK against donk

[ QUOTE ]
Good point. Maybe "play well" is not a good choice of words. He plays well from the standpoint that when he makes a big hand it is fairly obvious his opponent is representing a decent hand too so he knows that based on his style he can push and get called. He'll make bad calls not getting the correct pot odds. If he plays ATC and plays decent then presumably he is playing for implied odds. In this hand he could have hit any one of the flop cards and yes, even have 9,7. The Hero raised preflop and then C-bet. Pretty standard and at this point hero has either a king, possibly a pair over 8's or nothing, good spot to call to see what he does on the turn. Villian could even have a big hand (set) on the flop and wait for turn for Hero to really show strength before raising. If hero has nothing on flop hard for him to call any real raise / push (say hero had A,Q) but on the turn hero defines his hand further, or at least appears to do so as he could be firing a second barrel. At this point villian either had a big hand on the flop, got lucky on the turn, is on a draw (with a pair possibly) or has nothing. So I just think you should give it a little thought before hitting the call button.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks. I do get your and others' point about Hero's turn bet being an important part of this analysis, so forget my initial "insta-call" reaction -- it's probably closer than that. Much would obviously depend upon how Hero has been playing.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-08-2007, 08:45 AM
RainFall RainFall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 109
Default Re: NL100 AK TPTK against donk

I dont lay down much to anyone thats 32/20 or above..
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-08-2007, 11:42 AM
wallenborn wallenborn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 478
Default Re: NL100 AK TPTK against donk

[ QUOTE ]
he knows that based on his style he can push and get called.

[/ QUOTE ]

Some maniacs push here with air, but they tend to lose their bankroll quickly, so you don't see them often, 'cause they don't live long. Maniacs who survive (at least for a while) make money in two ways:

1. Constant aggression. Last night i played against a 80/60 maniac on FTP who would raise almost every hand preflop and bet hard on the flop. This worked amazingly often. Once people started to play back at him, he would shut down on the turn, but his preflop/flop-aggression didn't change.

2. Pushing big hands and getting called. Another maniac, Stars this time. Three to a flush on the board. LP, who had been targeting the maniac recently, bets turn, maniac in the BB pushes for 3 pot sizes more. LP calls and shows two pair. Maniac takes huge pot with a flush.

This maniac here check-called the flop, which sets an alarm bell off in my head. Then he check-raises the turn all-in. Call me a nit, but i'm putting him on flopped 2 pair with ATC and fold. I'll get his chips later.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.