Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: What's my plan ?
Swallow it and check fold 11 21.57%
Check call and try to win a showdown as cheap as possible 6 11.76%
Fire two barrels and give up 13 25.49%
eep firing to the end AK is quite a hand on that flop heads-up 3 5.88%
Something diffrent (please specify) 4 7.84%
I dunno but I would like to see the results 14 27.45%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-04-2007, 03:56 PM
MJBuddy MJBuddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,513
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

My typical stance on bubble play is that I'd be completely willing to take a flip knowing that my fold equity is much higher and if I win the flip I will have the chips to go much deeper ITM. It also helps because people see you restealing with a lot of cards and you get less respect when you get a really strong hand UTG once ITM. Having AJ look you up when you push back with AK is the real stack builder once ITM.

Granted, I'm not entirely sure how relevant all this is to 180s in particular, but I imagine it's a universal ideal.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-04-2007, 11:27 PM
sledghammer sledghammer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 729
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

While a fold here is probably correct, you are thinking about the problem of unknowns correctly.

Let's say there are two types of players, tags(who make up 90% of the population in a 180 at this time and who will jam here 5%), and maniacs (10% of population, will jam here 25% of the time). If your unknown BB jams here, what is his range? Before he jams, he is 90% to be a tag, and 10% to be a maniac. After the jam, he is more likely to be a maniac:

(.10*.25)(.90*.05+.10*.25) = 35.7% chance he is a maniac, pushing 25% of his hands, 64.3% chance he is a tag, pushing 5%.

This is because after he jams, we have more information about his style, since maniacs jam here 5x as often as tags(according to our assumptions).

You can do EV calcs with those chances, they are only estimates though. I would think that the underlying proportion of maniacs at this stage of a 20/180 is much less than 10%.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-05-2007, 12:31 AM
MJBuddy MJBuddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,513
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

I think maniacs are a bit higher than 10% in general. Most of them weed out early and the ones who push their edges survive till the end, where I can see 10% being relatively correct.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-05-2007, 11:13 AM
All_In_Olly All_In_Olly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 202
Default Re: 180 Man Ballers: General Theoretical Question

One of the reasons I consistently fall at this stage of the 4/180 is that I don't adjust correctly and give some respect to the players still in the running.
(That and the fact that I'm nearing the end of my sixpack).

Readless and on the bubble, you've got to give some credit to the reraise and fold here IMO, though with AQ I'm probably calling.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.