|
|
#11
06-03-2007, 06:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
if bb is solid this looks like an easy 3bet. hm...his stats dont look solid. i really think he could have 33,55 hopin to get a chance to cr the flop. but with all the draws out i still think 3bettin cant be bad ... and we have outs.
|
|
#13
06-03-2007, 06:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
Reread. I agree now. BB can have a set here from time to time. Still it`s a 3bet. [/ QUOTE ] If hes a solid player he bets a set on that flop, even if you think he may have a set you call a push after your 3 bet right?
|
|
#14
06-03-2007, 06:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Reread. I agree now. BB can have a set here from time to time. Still it`s a 3bet. [/ QUOTE ] If hes a solid player he bets a set on that flop, even if you think he may have a set you call a push after your 3 bet right? [/ QUOTE ] Yea course. Worse 2ps are more likely than sets. He could sometimes shove a draw as well. He`s not solid obv.
|
|
#15
06-03-2007, 06:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 22$ invested. Turbomuck. NEVER put the stack in an unraised pot with 2 pairs. [/ QUOTE ] Joke? [/ QUOTE ] No for real. I've gor so little invested , and I don't want to go broke here. Maybe I just call, but here I def don't play for stacks unless I catch a boat on the river.
|
|
#16
06-03-2007, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 22$ invested. Turbomuck. NEVER put the stack in an unraised pot with 2 pairs. [/ QUOTE ] Joke? [/ QUOTE ] No for real. I've gor so little invested , and I don't want to go broke here. Maybe I just call, but here I def don't play for stacks unless I catch a boat on the river. [/ QUOTE ] You are such a pussy.
|
|
#17
06-03-2007, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 22$ invested. Turbomuck. NEVER put the stack in an unraised pot with 2 pairs. [/ QUOTE ] Joke? [/ QUOTE ] No for real. I've gor so little invested , and I don't want to go broke here. Maybe I just call, but here I def don't play for stacks unless I catch a boat on the river. [/ QUOTE ] you shoudlnt look at the hand this way imo
|
|
#19
06-03-2007, 07:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 22$ invested. Turbomuck. NEVER put the stack in an unraised pot with 2 pairs. [/ QUOTE ] Joke? [/ QUOTE ] No for real. I've gor so little invested , and I don't want to go broke here. Maybe I just call, but here I def don't play for stacks unless I catch a boat on the river. [/ QUOTE ] you shoudlnt look at the hand this way imo [/ QUOTE ] C'mon we're not forced to pay off a set. We've got so little invested. Even if villains are total donks don't you think there's a good chance we're behind here?
|
|
#20
06-03-2007, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: dont go broke in a limped pot
[ QUOTE ]
C'mon we're not forced to pay off a set. We've got so little invested. Even if villains are total donks don't you think there's a good chance we're behind here? [/ QUOTE ] The pot being limped has nothing to do with whether or not the play is +ev. I think it is more likely that the villain in question has a worse two pair/combo draw than a set and you're losing a ton of value folding here.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
