|
|
#11
06-03-2007, 03:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100NL:TPGK + flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The Turn card is intersting as it looks looks like its improved you hand but not sure if it actually has. [/ QUOTE ] barring KK(1combo) it has at minimum given you 2more outs [ QUOTE ] the guy who mentioned folding the turn has an interesting point. [/ QUOTE ] that he's scared to put money in the middle? [/ QUOTE ] No, that there are very few hands we beat. 
|
|
#12
06-03-2007, 04:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL:TPGK + flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] The Turn card is intersting as it looks looks like its improved you hand but not sure if it actually has. [/ QUOTE ] barring KK(1combo) it has at minimum given you 2more outs [ QUOTE ] the guy who mentioned folding the turn has an interesting point. [/ QUOTE ] that he's scared to put money in the middle? [/ QUOTE ] No, that there are very few hands we beat. [/ QUOTE ] very few hands make sense that beat us as well, he has to show up with random bluffs basically never for a fold to even be considered
|
|
#13
06-03-2007, 05:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL:TPGK + flush draw
I guess since he's aggro I might check behind in case he donks the turn, or raise flop if you think he'd shove with a draw.
It's a messy spot but I think it played out as well as it could.
|
|
#14
06-03-2007, 05:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL:TPGK + flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
I guess since he's aggro I might check behind in case he donks the turn, or raise flop if you think he'd shove with a draw. It's a messy spot but I think it played out as well as it could. [/ QUOTE ] wait wtf you'd check behind on the flop?
|
|
#15
06-03-2007, 05:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL:TPGK + flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] The Turn card is intersting as it looks looks like its improved you hand but not sure if it actually has. [/ QUOTE ] barring KK(1combo) it has at minimum given you 2more outs [ QUOTE ] the guy who mentioned folding the turn has an interesting point. [/ QUOTE ] that he's scared to put money in the middle? [/ QUOTE ] No, that there are very few hands we beat. [/ QUOTE ] I think folding the turn is criminal. If my math is correct even if villain has a monster (KK, AT) we are getting the correct implied odds to call.
|
|
#16
06-03-2007, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL:TPGK + flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I guess since he's aggro I might check behind in case he donks the turn, or raise flop if you think he'd shove with a draw. It's a messy spot but I think it played out as well as it could. [/ QUOTE ] wait wtf you'd check behind on the flop? [/ QUOTE ] I dont think checking behind is really that bad because IMO villain is aggro enough to bluff a lot of turns.
|
|
#18
06-04-2007, 01:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100NL:TPGK + flush draw
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I guess since he's aggro I might check behind in case he donks the turn, or raise flop if you think he'd shove with a draw. It's a messy spot but I think it played out as well as it could. [/ QUOTE ] wait wtf you'd check behind on the flop? [/ QUOTE ] I dont think checking behind is really that bad because IMO villain is aggro enough to bluff a lot of turns. [/ QUOTE ] This is all I was getting at. Not something I'd generally do, but if you think it is the only way of getting a worse hand to put money in so be it. Plus, he would expect anyone with flush draw to c-bet so it'd be harder for him to put you on it, he might even represent it if it comes
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
