Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-30-2007, 06:13 PM
RiverHebrew2 RiverHebrew2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,293
Default Re: Super standard, right?

I woulda cbet flop for $75. If he flatcalled then I'd probably c/c smallish bet on turn or c/f to fairly big one, but I think double barreling this kind of turn is rele bad OOP. As played, meh, It's ok but I think he's calling with everything he bets (AQ and AK).
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-30-2007, 06:13 PM
johnnyrocket johnnyrocket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 8 tabling and raising all donk bets
Posts: 3,679
Default Re: Super standard, right?

[ QUOTE ]
I have done this a lot lately and I get called by literally everything in the book. Like the consensus I would lead flop here and get it in that way. I think I just call the turn here because there is like no FE here ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

yea, there is some fold equity tho, but i like bet/call flop or just 3 betting it, your even money atleast and u can push him off lots of aces so u have fold equity which puts u well above 50% with this bet
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-30-2007, 06:22 PM
luckychewy luckychewy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: misplaying kings
Posts: 6,104
Default Re: Super standard, right?

i think this reeks of fps in more than one way. my std would be call in bb w/ this hand but could obv 3-bet under certain circumstances, but in a vacuum i call. then i bet/call flop, though i guess c/r ai is okay. once the flop is checked through i just bet/fold turn. your draw is worth less that the board paired and you won't get shoved on much, though when u do it's an ez fold. once u check twice ur hand looks a lot like tt or something, so the c/r is not believable at all as others have pointed out. i'd rather c/c turn and play the river than c/r ai, but i would be leading turn very often after a flop check. again, with reads i think c/r ai is okay but with the only information being that btn is a reasonable tag i think this hand is botched.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-30-2007, 06:23 PM
edge edge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: Super standard, right?

[ QUOTE ]
i think this line is horrendous. I would call soooo light here if I was villain. This is not a strong line at all...it looks like an obvious draw or bluff. If you do this with JJ/AA/AJ thats just rly rly bad. Bet flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, do you even realize what you wrote there? It completely contradicts itself.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-30-2007, 06:42 PM
Hoopster81 Hoopster81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: between the click of the light and the start of the dream
Posts: 3,648
Default Re: Super standard, right?

don't expect TAGs to bet A-high flops in 3-bet pots without the initiative very often
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-30-2007, 06:58 PM
xorbie xorbie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: far and away better
Posts: 15,690
Default Re: Super standard, right?

[ QUOTE ]
I was under the impression that this is a stronger line than leading the flop. I bet the flop probably 80+% of the time after reraising pre, but I'll throw in a check once in a while. I'd do this with JJ and AA (and AJ too I guess) at least some of the time for sure.

[/ QUOTE ]

it's a stronger line, but nobody thinks it is. in general 2/4 type players think anything wierd is a draw.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-30-2007, 07:03 PM
edge edge is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3,431
Default Re: Super standard, right?

So do you guys really never check a big hand after reraising pre out of position? I can understand c-betting all the time but that can make the turn very difficult to play when your hand is somewhere in the middle in terms of strength.

Edit: Or when you're on a draw [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-30-2007, 07:09 PM
wdead wdead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,323
Default Re: Super standard, right?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i think this line is horrendous. I would call soooo light here if I was villain. This is not a strong line at all...it looks like an obvious draw or bluff. If you do this with JJ/AA/AJ thats just rly rly bad. Bet flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, do you even realize what you wrote there? It completely contradicts itself.

[/ QUOTE ]

How?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-30-2007, 07:18 PM
tagtastic tagtastic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,795
Default Re: Super standard, right?

I lead most of the time on the flop here. I think checking the flop looking for a c/r is fine, but I'd have to be pretty sure my opponent would be betting this flop a lot thinking I'd missed and a crai would have some fold equity.

If you check and he checks behind, I think you have to lead the turn to represent a missed c/r. Both your equity in the hand and your fold equity goes way down on a blank turn imo, a c/r here looks fishy and gets called down a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-30-2007, 07:23 PM
tagtastic tagtastic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,795
Default Re: Super standard, right?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i think this line is horrendous. I would call soooo light here if I was villain. This is not a strong line at all...it looks like an obvious draw or bluff. If you do this with JJ/AA/AJ thats just rly rly bad. Bet flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, do you even realize what you wrote there? It completely contradicts itself.

[/ QUOTE ]

How?

[/ QUOTE ]

Uh.. if you have a big hand here like AA/JJ/AJ you really want to get called down "soooo light".

I understand almost always betting and getting played back at or called down light is probably a better overall situation, but saying "taking this line with a big hand is terrible because it'll be called down super light" doesn't make any sense.

Balance & unexploitability are overrated.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.