#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 JJ non-standard line
betting for protection?????? he ain't calling here with anything you beat unless he is duhduhduh
so its ok |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 JJ non-standard line
[ QUOTE ]
betting for protection?????? he ain't calling here with anything you beat unless he is duhduhduh so its ok [/ QUOTE ] Then why arent we flat calling and letting him bluff the rest of his stack off on river? This is a uber thin value shove. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 JJ non-standard line
It's not that it's thin, it's just that the only value we get is from protection. We never really get called by worse.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 JJ non-standard line
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] betting for protection?????? he ain't calling here with anything you beat unless he is duhduhduh so its ok [/ QUOTE ] Then why arent we flat calling and letting him bluff the rest of his stack off on river? This is a uber thin value shove. [/ QUOTE ] read the WHOLE hand, villain is a donk, so its ok |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 JJ non-standard line
.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 JJ non-standard line
I like it. Those players call with 88/99 here a lot.
|
|
|