#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($114) Gramps has got some \'splaining to do
I'd pass on JTo let alone J8o against a solid player but against some idiot regs that push ATC here it would be an EZ call. It is a clear mistake against the top 28% though (what I'd tend to push).
E: I'd fold K7o here |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($114) Gramps has got some \'splaining to do
[ QUOTE ]
Fair enough, thanks for responding. Let's be friends, K? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Ryan [/ QUOTE ] Paging Lee Jones collusion police! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($114) Gramps has got some \'splaining to do
[ QUOTE ]
I play > 100 SNGs a day normally, 9-11 at a time across two sites, [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Besides, gambling can be fun... [/ QUOTE ] If you're playing over a hundred SNGs a day every day, I can't imagine anything you ever do in any of them is fun anymore. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($114) Gramps has got some \'splaining to do
except going with bucket loads of benjamins to the bank
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($114) Gramps has got some \'splaining to do
Without running it through sngpt, this call prob cost Gramps a buck or two. Getting it posted that you're a super loose caller from the bb is worth hmmm...like hundreds over the long run?
Seems like a good call to me. |
|
|