Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-25-2007, 09:07 PM
TwistedEcho TwistedEcho is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,913
Default Re: ($60) Oh noes, you sunk my battleship!11!

[ QUOTE ]
Wow, YUCK. I say call and reevaluate.

Ryan

[/ QUOTE ]

River A, he bets $180 when i check to him. Call again?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-25-2007, 09:09 PM
suzzer99 suzzer99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: guuhhhn inner nets
Posts: 13,634
Default Re: ($60) Oh noes, you sunk my battleship!11!

YES - it's just 180. How many times do you have to be ahead, like 1 in 5? He could easily have a lower PP or an 8, which you are totally priced in to call down.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-25-2007, 09:09 PM
DevinLake DevinLake is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 6,022
Default Re: ($60) Oh noes, you sunk my battleship!11!

[ QUOTE ]
River Ax i check he bets 180. Do we call again?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yuck. Against a reasonable opponent, they never have an A here. So, when they bet it is either a bluff or a monster. I don't give people credit for quads, so I certainly think he's bluffing often enough to call. But, he sounds like the type that can show up with an A here too

But, getting like 10-1 odds I can't fold here.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-25-2007, 09:10 PM
ryanghall ryanghall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,789
Default Re: ($60) Oh noes, you sunk my battleship!11!

He'd have to *really* sucky at that point for you to have him beat (cause you were hoping he just had Ace high when you called the turn bet). How sucky is he? I'm very likely folding.

Ryan
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-25-2007, 09:12 PM
TwistedEcho TwistedEcho is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,913
Default Re: ($60) Oh noes, you sunk my battleship!11!

[ QUOTE ]
He'd have to *really* sucky at that point for you to have him beat (cause you were hoping he just had Ace high when you called the turn bet). How sucky is he? I'm very likely folding.

Ryan

[/ QUOTE ]

he might be the worse player i've played with at the 60s. Sharkscope has him stuck 2k over 777 sngs but no idea what limits since i was too lazy to click and see.

I dunno, just seems like if i wasn't already ahead he just sucked out with an ace, i'd obv be much happier with a 2 river and find he is value betting KKK55 or sth [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-25-2007, 09:12 PM
suzzer99 suzzer99 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: guuhhhn inner nets
Posts: 13,634
Default Re: ($60) Oh noes, you sunk my battleship!11!

[ QUOTE ]
He'd have to *really* sucky at that point for you to have him beat (cause you were hoping he just had Ace high when you called the turn bet). How sucky is he? I'm very likely folding.

Ryan

[/ QUOTE ]
Why can't 22-77 or something suited (or not) with an 8 be in his range here? Has to be enough times to call 2 small bets. You just can't put him on quads, and no one bets a bare ace like that.

Anyone who would make a bet like that on the turn is obviously a terrible player, and I'm really reluctant to put terrible players who don't know how to bet on hands.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-26-2007, 01:53 AM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: ($60) Oh noes, you sunk my battleship!11!

I probably call down. I also checkraise the flop probably.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-26-2007, 01:57 AM
TwistedEcho TwistedEcho is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 3,913
Default Re: ($60) Oh noes, you sunk my battleship!11!

[ QUOTE ]
I probably call down. I also checkraise the flop probably.

[/ QUOTE ]

i sometimes lead, sometimes CR. These opponents seemed the type who'd just keep calling down when it went bet/bet/bet with 66 since who'd lead with a king, but if i checkraise they might just fold their midpairs.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-27-2007, 03:28 AM
curtains curtains is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 13,960
Default Re: ($60) Oh noes, you sunk my battleship!11!

check call , check call and hope for the best. Don't fold no matter what. I think going for extra value on the river or turn is a bit risky but not completely terrible if he's really 100% VPIP. It could be you think he's 100% to put all his money in with any pair from 22-77 or many ace high hands, I dunno just how bad he was though.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-27-2007, 06:35 PM
Jay Riall Jay Riall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Over the line
Posts: 15,184
Default Re: ($60) Oh noes, you sunk my battleship!11!

Checking the flop is way better than betting imo with stacks this shallow.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.