|
|
#11
05-21-2007, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: B&M Strategy Forum - Shouldn\'t We Have One
You could put LIVE in the subject line, QQ UTG LIVE or But it was sooted, LIVE etc.
I don't think we need to put strategy in the Where is the best Pizza,Who's floor sucks the worst, tipping forum. 
|
|
#12
05-21-2007, 08:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: B&M Strategy Forum - Shouldn\'t We Have One
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I still like the idea from before or renaming the Full Ring forum "Full Ring & B&M". [/ QUOTE ] I don't have any problems renaming our forum. The only concern that jumps out (and it is minor) is that if people somehow get the impression it is only for B&M games, not online as well. All B&M posters are more than welcome at FR - While we do have mostly smaller stakes players ($100NL and below), there are many who play above that. Plus, I'd argue a $100NL game online is just as hard as a $2-$5 live game and the thought process is much the same, even with the differences. [/ QUOTE ] How about Full Ring Online and B&M NL?
|
|
#13
05-21-2007, 08:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: B&M Strategy Forum - Shouldn\'t We Have One
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I still like the idea from before or renaming the Full Ring forum "Full Ring & B&M". [/ QUOTE ] I don't have any problems renaming our forum. The only concern that jumps out (and it is minor) is that if people somehow get the impression it is only for B&M games, not online as well. All B&M posters are more than welcome at FR - While we do have mostly smaller stakes players ($100NL and below), there are many who play above that. Plus, I'd argue a $100NL game online is just as hard as a $2-$5 live game and the thought process is much the same, even with the differences. [/ QUOTE ] I am one of the people that dislikes the auto-moving of B&M strategy questions to the microstakes forum, but this sounds great to me. [/ QUOTE ] i think the reason why you don't like it is the word "micro", and I don't blame you. The funny thing is you would be better served moving the vast majority of 1/2 - 2/5 NL posts there because the games play remarkably similar to online microstakes, but since we have come to terms with the fact that B&M players don't like to be thought of as playing smaller than small stakes the full ring is the second best option (Its a very close call between the two in all other regards of course, B&M low limit hands would fit just fine in either forum but the uNL games play closer to 1/2 or 2/5 games do live).
|
|
#15
05-21-2007, 08:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: B&M Strategy Forum - Shouldn\'t We Have One
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I still like the idea from before or renaming the Full Ring forum "Full Ring & B&M". [/ QUOTE ] I don't have any problems renaming our forum. The only concern that jumps out (and it is minor) is that if people somehow get the impression it is only for B&M games, not online as well. All B&M posters are more than welcome at FR - While we do have mostly smaller stakes players ($100NL and below), there are many who play above that. Plus, I'd argue a $100NL game online is just as hard as a $2-$5 live game and the thought process is much the same, even with the differences. [/ QUOTE ] I am one of the people that dislikes the auto-moving of B&M strategy questions to the microstakes forum, but this sounds great to me. [/ QUOTE ] i think the reason why you don't like it is the word "micro" [/ QUOTE ] You think wrong.
|
|
#16
05-21-2007, 08:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: B&M Strategy Forum - Shouldn\'t We Have One
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I still like the idea from before or renaming the Full Ring forum "Full Ring & B&M". [/ QUOTE ] I don't have any problems renaming our forum. The only concern that jumps out (and it is minor) is that if people somehow get the impression it is only for B&M games, not online as well. All B&M posters are more than welcome at FR - While we do have mostly smaller stakes players ($100NL and below), there are many who play above that. Plus, I'd argue a $100NL game online is just as hard as a $2-$5 live game and the thought process is much the same, even with the differences. [/ QUOTE ] I am one of the people that dislikes the auto-moving of B&M strategy questions to the microstakes forum, but this sounds great to me. [/ QUOTE ] i think the reason why you don't like it is the word "micro" [/ QUOTE ] You think wrong. [/ QUOTE ] OK, I'll bite. You want to say I'm wrong, but you don't give the reason why. Then whats your problem with posting in the microstakes forum? The players who play in games that are most similar to live 1/2 and 2/5 spend their time there, and they already have a fair amount of live B&M hands being posted there. I think the Full Ring forum is a very happy compromise of course - but its your opinion we are talking about, not mine.
|
|
#17
05-21-2007, 10:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: B&M Strategy Forum - Shouldn\'t We Have One
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I still like the idea from before or renaming the Full Ring forum "Full Ring & B&M". [/ QUOTE ] I don't have any problems renaming our forum. The only concern that jumps out (and it is minor) is that if people somehow get the impression it is only for B&M games, not online as well. All B&M posters are more than welcome at FR - While we do have mostly smaller stakes players ($100NL and below), there are many who play above that. Plus, I'd argue a $100NL game online is just as hard as a $2-$5 live game and the thought process is much the same, even with the differences. [/ QUOTE ] I am one of the people that dislikes the auto-moving of B&M strategy questions to the microstakes forum, but this sounds great to me. [/ QUOTE ] i think the reason why you don't like it is the word "micro" [/ QUOTE ] You think wrong. [/ QUOTE ] OK, I'll bite. You want to say I'm wrong, but you don't give the reason why. Then whats your problem with posting in the microstakes forum? The players who play in games that are most similar to live 1/2 and 2/5 spend their time there, and they already have a fair amount of live B&M hands being posted there. I think the Full Ring forum is a very happy compromise of course - but its your opinion we are talking about, not mine. [/ QUOTE ] Let me get this straight... you make a stupid assumption about what I am thinking and you argue against it. I then tell you your assumption was wrong, and now I have to defend myself? I don't think so. If you are just going to make stuff up in order to have an argument, you don't need me, and I have better things to do. You and I agree that Full Ring is the best solution. Let's just go with that.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
