#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Terrorism
[ QUOTE ]
This could change if/when terrorist have the means to use weapons of mass destruction. [/ QUOTE ] And hence the need to kill the terrorists before they acquire the means, as they clearly have the intent and desire to do so. Plus prevention of conventional attacks on our homeland (and yours) also requires that we confront them. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Terrorism
[ QUOTE ]
Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This could change if/when terrorist have the means to use weapons of mass destruction. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- And hence the need to kill the terrorists before they acquire the means, as they clearly have the intent and desire to do so [/ QUOTE ] Personally I'm against their cause so I try not to help them. chez |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Terrorism
arhant -- why do you hate freedom?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Terrorism
I did the math awhile back (after standing in a few airport security lines) and if terrorists blew up one commercial flight each month, you'd still be able to fly to the SUN and back multiple times before your most likely altitude was -6ft.
Terrorism is 99.9+% psychological and is exceptionally likely to be played without WMD. If the expected response to a terrorist using WMD is for the US to WMD their home country into oblivion, it's a bad strategy. When the expected response is (at worst) a half-assed US military operation or economic pressure (that has no chance for long-term success and serves as a great recruiting tool), it's a great strategy. Until the terrorists fear a devastating response, we have no short-to-medium term solution to the problem, and any resources spent "combating" the threat are a complete waste. The US doesn't have the stomach for a devastating response, and the terrorists aren't dumb enough to provoke one, so we're stuck in a holding pattern. Our response to terrorism is tens (and maybe hundreds) of times more damaging than 9/11, but as longs as morons act (and vote) out of fear and other irrational psychological impulses, and as long as politicians are willing to exploit it, we're screwed. And I don't have much faith in the intelligence of the average american or the lack of opportunism of the average politician. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Terrorism
Caught a talk by a retired JPL scientist recently. One of his specialties was asteroids and assessing the Earth-impact risks of same. This lead him to looking at various other risks and how they compared. What he found lead him to the same conclusions you've made (and have been known to the insurance industry for quite some time): the risk from unlikely events is generally greatly exaggerated.
RISKS OF DEATH (lifetime odds, US residents, unless otherwise noted) Asteroid impact risks are for currently remaining undiscovered asteroids. Cause of Death One in: Accidents (all kinds)..........................36 Motor vehicle accident.......................90 Suicide........................................120 Homicide......................................185 Falls...........................................25 0 Assault by firearm...........................325 Terrorism (Middle East)....................1,000 Fire or Smoke...............................1,100 Firearms accident...........................2,500 Natural forces (storms etc.)............3,400 Electrocution...............................5,000 Drowning....................................9,000 Flood........................................27,00 0 Airplane crash.............................30,000 Lightning strike...........................43,000 Tornado....................................46,000 Legal execution............................60,000 Terrorism (incl. 9/11).....................80,000 Venomous bite or sting..................100,000 Tsunami (worldwide)......................100,000 Hurricane...................................110,00 0 Earthquakes...............................130,000 Fireworks accident........................600,000 Asteroid impact (all sizes)...............750,000 Terrorism (excl. 9/11)..................1,100,000 Amusement park rides....................1,100,000 Asteroid impact (global)................1,500,000 Driving to a local event (once).........1,500,000 Food poisoning by botulism..............3,000,000 Regional impact (tsunami)...............3,200,000 Local Impact (Tunguska).................4,000,000 Impact mass extinction (comets).........8,000,000 Shark attack................................8,000,000 Drinking tap water.........................10,000,000 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Terrorism
I'm sort of surprised my risk of homocide isn't higher. I mean, of course mine IS higher, since I'm young and live in a fairly dangerous city, but I'm surprised the overall risk isn't a little higher than that.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Terrorism
[ QUOTE ]
I'm sort of surprised my risk of homocide isn't higher. I mean, of course mine IS higher, since I'm young and live in a fairly dangerous city, but I'm surprised the overall risk isn't a little higher than that. [/ QUOTE ] Really? A .5% chance that my death will be caused by homicide seems insanely high to me. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Terrorism
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It seems to me that terrorism is essentially NO threat to the US. [/ QUOTE ] 9/11 Death Total: 2,973 (not counting terrorist scum) [/ QUOTE ] How about this? 15,495 murders just in 2005. That's right, stop the terrorists, smoke 'em out of their holes... Well, at least that'll make you feel safer. Or not? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Terrorism
[ QUOTE ]
And when millions of people all have the power to kill tens of thousands of people each, what happens? Bad things. [/ QUOTE ] Actually, good things. When people realize that fighting is only going to get them all killed, they're much more likely to set their differences aside. Have you been keeping up with history for the past half a century or what? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Terrorism
[ QUOTE ]
I'm sort of surprised my risk of homocide isn't higher. I mean, of course mine IS higher, since I'm young and live in a fairly dangerous city, but I'm surprised the overall risk isn't a little higher than that. [/ QUOTE ] I blame this on the "CNN" effect. Nowadays, a murder takes place in the Okefenokee, Florida swamp and you hear about it instantly in Vancouver, Washington. This generates a lot of unwarranted fear (and sells a lot of airtime along the way). Personally I think it's pretty interesting that you're about as likely to die in a ladder accident or other fall as you are at the hands of another human. Also, I think most people would be surprised to learn that they're more likely to kill themselves than to be intentionally killed by one of their fellow super-monkeys. |
|
|