Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-10-2007, 05:29 PM
Flixxx Flixxx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Nit
Posts: 414
Default Re: NL100 folding set to represented flush?

[ QUOTE ]
how is the BB 2 and u made it 3.5?

[/ QUOTE ]

converter messes that up for ongame.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-10-2007, 05:38 PM
bilbo-san bilbo-san is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In ur game, pickin off ur bluffz
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: NL100 folding set to represented flush?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
can you reason the shove? is it just villains stacksize? I most likely made a bad fold and actually I also never fold sets anywhere near a 3flush board.

[/ QUOTE ]

Stack size yes. If your plan is to check/fold river on a non-paired board (bad plan) it's better to shove the turn and get some fold equity against non-diamond hands. If he calls you have outs even if he has a flush. In retrospect if you're playing the hand like that you should have folded to the minraise on the turn...

[/ QUOTE ]

Um... no. You do know that a full house beats a flush or straight, right? And you also know that you don't want any FE against non-diamond hands because they are all drawing dead, right?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-10-2007, 06:58 PM
dirtylobster dirtylobster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,124
Default Re: NL100 folding set to represented flush?

[ QUOTE ]
Um... no. You do know that a full house beats a flush or straight, right? And you also know that you don't want any FE against non-diamond hands because they are all drawing dead, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, you're right, $12:$54 on the turn seems to give us just the right odds to draw for a paired board. It just seems weak to just call with the set and fold to a river bet with these stacks... but on the other hand there aren't any hands that we beat on a blank river.

Are you still sure it's spew to shove the turn?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-10-2007, 07:04 PM
Paul Thomson Paul Thomson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: donking it up NL200
Posts: 3,589
Default Re: NL100 folding set to represented flush?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Um... no. You do know that a full house beats a flush or straight, right? And you also know that you don't want any FE against non-diamond hands because they are all drawing dead, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, you're right, $12:$54 on the turn seems to give us just the right odds to draw for a paired board. It just seems weak to just call with the set and fold to a river bet with these stacks... but on the other hand there aren't any hands that we beat on a blank river.

Are you still sure it's spew to shove the turn?

[/ QUOTE ]

u need to know what questions to ask inorder to find the right answer. so the only reason to push the river is to charge draws or get called by worse hands, right?

- Do worse hands call...nope.
- Does A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] X:call: -- i don't know. he won't be getting the odds to call, so he should fold.

So I dont see any reason in pushing the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-10-2007, 07:09 PM
mscags mscags is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Valencia Spain
Posts: 3,084
Default Re: NL100 folding set to represented flush?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Um... no. You do know that a full house beats a flush or straight, right? And you also know that you don't want any FE against non-diamond hands because they are all drawing dead, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, you're right, $12:$54 on the turn seems to give us just the right odds to draw for a paired board. It just seems weak to just call with the set and fold to a river bet with these stacks... but on the other hand there aren't any hands that we beat on a blank river.

Are you still sure it's spew to shove the turn?

[/ QUOTE ]

u need to know what questions to ask inorder to find the right answer. so the only reason to push the river is to charge draws or get called by worse hands, right?

- Do worse hands call...nope.
- Does A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] X:call: -- i don't know. he won't be getting the odds to call, so he should fold.

So I dont see any reason in pushing the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm pretty sure two pair hands call here, plus you dont mind pushing out someone with a pair+diamond draw. The pot is getting decent size, worry about taking it down.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-10-2007, 07:14 PM
Paul Thomson Paul Thomson is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: donking it up NL200
Posts: 3,589
Default Re: NL100 folding set to represented flush?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Um... no. You do know that a full house beats a flush or straight, right? And you also know that you don't want any FE against non-diamond hands because they are all drawing dead, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, you're right, $12:$54 on the turn seems to give us just the right odds to draw for a paired board. It just seems weak to just call with the set and fold to a river bet with these stacks... but on the other hand there aren't any hands that we beat on a blank river.

Are you still sure it's spew to shove the turn?

[/ QUOTE ]

u need to know what questions to ask inorder to find the right answer. so the only reason to push the river is to charge draws or get called by worse hands, right?

- Do worse hands call...nope.
- Does A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] X:call: -- i don't know. he won't be getting the odds to call, so he should fold.

So I dont see any reason in pushing the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm pretty sure two pair hands call here, plus you dont mind pushing out someone with a pair+diamond draw. The pot is getting decent size, worry about taking it down.

[/ QUOTE ]

read, the whole thread over. 2 of the 3 draws just got there. and i'm not so sure about the two pair comment because doesn't that raise the flop?

and just because the pot is bid doesn't mean we should put in money when behind. this inherently doesn't maximize EV.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.