#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Olsen Twin thin value bet vs donk
[ QUOTE ]
what range did you put him on that made you called the turn? [/ QUOTE ] That's a good point. TBH I just didn't see a hand he'd play this way except possibly Q8 or Q7. I felt he had 8x, T9, maybe even 7x and he just didn't believe me. Maybe I'm wrong but I feel the donk/call, redonk line is often a medium strength 8x type of hand in this situation so I opted to call. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Olsen Twin thin value bet vs donk
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what range did you put him on that made you called the turn? [/ QUOTE ] That's a good point. TBH I just didn't see a hand he'd play this way except possibly Q8 or Q7. I felt he had 8x, T9, maybe even 7x and he just didn't believe me. Maybe I'm wrong but I feel the donk/call, redonk line is often a medium strength 8x type of hand in this situation so I opted to call. [/ QUOTE ] his aggression doesn't seem like he's donking turn with those hands. I think turn is a fold. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Olsen Twin thin value bet vs donk
I think I agree that turn is a fold. Low AF donks don't spring to life with nothing. Anyway he called by shove and his KK is good. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] Thanks for the responses though guys
|
|
|