#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Magic Glasses Variant
I'd give the glasses to Phil Ivey and play him heads-up. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Magic Glasses Variant
[ QUOTE ]
median would be second [/ QUOTE ] no. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Magic Glasses Variant
[ QUOTE ]
yes, yes, yes, yes, not sure about average but median would be second, less than half the time [/ QUOTE ]median COULD be second, but if its less than half of the time, then median ISNT second. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Magic Glasses Variant
I think it would be pretty close. It depends on a lot of things, including what game you are playing. In no limit, I would liek to think that I would be able ot play my opponent off there bluffs often enough to make a profit. In limit, I would like to think the same thing but I do not think it would work. I think you get caught bluffing often enough with 23 in limit that peeps start to call you down with almost anything.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Magic Glasses Variant
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] yes, yes, yes, yes, not sure about average but median would be second, less than half the time [/ QUOTE ]median COULD be second, but if its less than all of the time, then median ISNT second. [/ QUOTE ] |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Magic Glasses Variant
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] yes, yes, yes, yes, not sure about average but median would be second, less than half the time [/ QUOTE ]median COULD be second, but if its less than all of the time, then median ISNT second. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ]2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4. whats the median? btw i meant to mention that this applies to NL only. obviously it would never be profitable in limit. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Magic Glasses Variant
[ QUOTE ]
if you played in the main event 1000 times, what would your average finish be? how often would you finish less than 2nd? [/ QUOTE ] I'm gonna give my SWAG: I'm guessing your glasses give you a 50x advantage over any player. (This is probably way off.) So, with ~5000 players, you have 1/100th chance of finishing 2nd, 3rd, 4th ... Average finish = 50th place. You finish less than 2nd 99% of the time. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Magic Glasses Variant
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] yes, yes, yes, yes, not sure about average but median would be second, less than half the time [/ QUOTE ]median COULD be second, but if its less than all of the time, then median ISNT second. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ]2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 4. whats the median? [/ QUOTE ] Duh, brain fart. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Magic Glasses Variant
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] yes, yes, yes, yes, not sure about average but median would be second, less than half the time [/ QUOTE ]median COULD be second, but if its less than half of the time, then median ISNT second. [/ QUOTE ] uh, if you finish less than second less than half the time, then the median is second. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Magic Glasses Variant
IT would depend entirely on game selection and how you read people.
Since you have the nut low you cannot win a showdown. You must win by getting everyone else in the hand to fold. You would know the exact strength of people's hands and thus you would not try to push them off of strong hands. The key would be pegging who you could make lay down marignal hands in bigger pots heads up. |
|
|