|
|
#11
03-26-2007, 10:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 88 in the BB blind vs a TAG raise in UTG+2
Okay, I totally disliked this hand when I played it. I tend to play too damn weak tight sometimes. From the responses I should have donked the flop or since I checked, check raised and gone from there.
As it was, I wimped out and just called down and the villain turned over AA. Doc 
|
|
#12
03-26-2007, 10:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 88 in the BB blind vs a TAG raise in UTG+2
[ QUOTE ]
Okay, I totally disliked this hand when I played it. I tend to play too damn weak tight sometimes. From the responses I should have donked the flop or since I checked, check raised and gone from there. As it was, I wimped out and just called down and the villain turned over AA. Doc [/ QUOTE ] note: if you're calling in the blind and only playing for 'set value' then just fold here (there aren't enough players in to call PF using this concept)
|
|
#13
03-27-2007, 02:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 88 in the BB blind vs a TAG raise in UTG+2
[ QUOTE ]
if you're calling in the blind and only playing for 'set value' then just fold here (there aren't enough players in to call PF using this concept) [/ QUOTE ]Why not? Correct me if I'm wrong, but raking away SB, you get 5:1 on the call, closing the action; if your set wins 10% of the time you need to win 4 sb postflop. Added the times where the 88 are good alone and I'm also calling this when button has folded.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
