#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind fight vs decent lag - 5/10 deepish
his range is not heavily weighted towards AA+.
would you really overbet push this riv? [ QUOTE ] results? [/ QUOTE ] I'll give results if there's some more discussion. I thought results were quite interesting actually |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind fight vs decent lag - 5/10 deepish
It'd be funny if you valuebet over his 88.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind fight vs decent lag - 5/10 deepish
since when is 30ish too loose? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind fight vs decent lag - 5/10 deepish
looks like a decent spot for him to induce a bluff / lose less vs a seven, which it sounds like he thinks you could have.
i dont mind the turn call with the history, and the river looks like an easy check given the board texture and how you described his view of you. also someone else said that its pretty obvious you dont have a big hand here, so i think bluffing is out at this point. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind fight vs decent lag - 5/10 deepish
[ QUOTE ]
id call, and check behind now. i like how this was played. [/ QUOTE ] |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind fight vs decent lag - 5/10 deepish
Anyways I checked behind and we split the pot. He showed T9o and I'm not sure what to think about that.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Blind fight vs decent lag - 5/10 deepish
[ QUOTE ]
Anyways I checked behind and we split the pot. He showed T9o and I'm not sure what to think about that. [/ QUOTE ] cool hand, result is fine. |
|
|