|
|
#11
03-17-2007, 07:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: the stinkypete rathole theorem
If i'm the best player at the table (or at least one of the top 2, and I should be if i'm game-selecting well) then I want as much money as possible in my stack at all times.
Although I have played with guys who did something like this, whether it was intentional or not, and when I see somebody sitting in shortstacked I assume they suck. Then I look back a few hands later to see they're full, and change my mind. So I guess it could possibly work to throw your opponents off a bit, but not really if theyre paying attention. 
|
|
#13
03-17-2007, 07:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: the stinkypete rathole theorem
[ QUOTE ]
Why not just buy in full and post behind the button? [/ QUOTE ] This is so crazy it just might work [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
|
#14
03-17-2007, 07:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: the stinkypete rathole theorem
[ QUOTE ]
it's never correct to buy in full when you first sit down at a table. buy in for 20bb, post your blinds, buy in full on the button. discuss. [/ QUOTE ] This is correct, but so marginal that it is not worth the hassle
|
|
#15
03-17-2007, 07:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: the stinkypete rathole theorem
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] it's never correct to buy in full when you first sit down at a table. buy in for 20bb, post your blinds, buy in full on the button. discuss. [/ QUOTE ] This is correct, but so marginal that it is not worth the hassle [/ QUOTE ] it's worth at least a couple bucks at higher limits. i'd say a few extra clicks for a couple bucks is worth the hassle.
|
|
#16
03-17-2007, 07:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: the stinkypete rathole theorem
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] it's never correct to buy in full when you first sit down at a table. buy in for 20bb, post your blinds, buy in full on the button. discuss. [/ QUOTE ] This is correct, but so marginal that it is not worth the hassle [/ QUOTE ] it's worth at least a couple bucks at higher limits. i'd say a few extra clicks for a couple bucks is worth the hassle. [/ QUOTE ] im not sure a/b other HS guys, but i dont even know my acct balances down to the nearest thousand. 10$ doesnt matter
|
|
#17
03-17-2007, 07:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: the stinkypete rathole theorem
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] it's never correct to buy in full when you first sit down at a table. buy in for 20bb, post your blinds, buy in full on the button. discuss. [/ QUOTE ] This is correct, but so marginal that it is not worth the hassle [/ QUOTE ] it's worth at least a couple bucks at higher limits. i'd say a few extra clicks for a couple bucks is worth the hassle. [/ QUOTE ] not if you suck playing a 20 bb stack compared to a 100 bb stack. Then it is not worth the hassle.
|
|
#18
03-17-2007, 08:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: the stinkypete rathole theorem
[ QUOTE ]
sounds like its straight outa rolfs book [/ QUOTE ] rolf has a ratholing book? where can i purchase this?
|
|
#19
03-17-2007, 08:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: the stinkypete rathole theorem
[ QUOTE ]
im not sure a/b other HS guys, but i dont even know my acct balances down to the nearest thousand. 10$ doesnt matter [/ QUOTE ] eh, I don't think that follows from not knowing. If a ten spot fell out of your pocket would you pick it up?
|
|
#20
03-17-2007, 08:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: the stinkypete rathole theorem
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] it's never correct to buy in full when you first sit down at a table. buy in for 20bb, post your blinds, buy in full on the button. discuss. [/ QUOTE ] This is correct, but so marginal that it is not worth the hassle [/ QUOTE ] it's worth at least a couple bucks at higher limits. i'd say a few extra clicks for a couple bucks is worth the hassle. [/ QUOTE ] not if you suck playing a 20 bb stack compared to a 100 bb stack. Then it is not worth the hassle. [/ QUOTE ] thats what I was thinking.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
