PokerStars 100NL easier than 25NL?

[catcher193]

[ QUOTE ]
Shrug. My play/bluffs/etc work better at 100 NL than at 25 NL. I win at both. If that means I suck, then okay. I'm happy with sucking. Originally, all I wanted the poker money for was to buy CDs. Now it does more than that.

[/ QUOTE ]

anybody else find this insanely funny?

[pdoran10]

yes. lolroflmaorofllol

[Abdullaev]

What do you think 25 NL players buy with their winnings? Hookers and blow?

[Paul B.]

This thread has potential.

[Abdullaev]

So anyway, when I'm banging yet another hooker with the $24.25 I made from my set of threes, I like to think about the coke I snorted off her ass.

[Montezuma21]

i personally find 100NL much much easier: players are much more predictable because their lines always reflect their holdings, their ranges are smaller, and it's easier to isolate the donks. my winrates are somewhat similar at 100NL and 25NL (maybe a little higher at 100NL).

I must say i absolutely LOATHE 25NL. it kind feels like wading through treacle sometimes. i can't bluff as much for the aforementioned reasons, or make thinner value bets and calls IMO. also i find it hard to give a damn playing for 25NL. I'm NEVER going busto again.

[pokergrader]

NL1000 on party was much easier than NL100, but dont tell anybody.

[Sigurd]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Shrug. My play/bluffs/etc work better at 100 NL than at 25 NL. I win at both. If that means I suck, then okay. I'm happy with sucking. Originally, all I wanted the poker money for was to buy CDs. Now it does more than that.

[/ QUOTE ]

anybody else find this insanely funny?

[/ QUOTE ]

I find pretty much everything, but the part you highligted, very entertaining.

[Avocado]

i have $27.08 left on pokerstars and was thinking in play $1 donkaments, but now i obv. will short stack 100nl

[Stake Monster]

the difference between 25NL and 100NL is 75 dollars.