Toll Free Govt Neteller Related Phone Number To Call

[frommagio]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you follow this link http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys/
You will find the US govts attorney who was responsible for this action being taken, and the strategy being used.

[/ QUOTE ]
Where is this “strategy” you speak of???

[ QUOTE ]
I would suggest calling the toll free number (during business hours) since it is touted as a way to report public corruption, and it rings the offices of the man responsible for our neteller nightmare.

[/ QUOTE ]
Are you SURE that’s the number for his office and not for the DOJ’s whistle-blower hotline (to report corrupt US Attorneys and such)?

[ QUOTE ]
You might ask how the government can hijack money from the neteller accounts, without any proof of wrongdoing by the individuals involved. Some never gambled, but used Neteller as an ebay like transfer medium, and had money snatched anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]
First, the DOJ didn’t “hijack NETeller accounts.” They intercepted transactions to/from NETeller. NETeller still has my $23,500, not the DOJ.

Second, the charges are money laundering. NETeller’s founders are being accused of facilitating the transfer of money on behalf of those who are trying to disguise its origin and/or purpose. Which brings me to a BIG question: If you WEREN’T using NETeller for gaming, what exactly were you using it for? Because I tell ya, the US Government does not like it at all when people start exchanging money they don’t know about and can’t trace.

[ QUOTE ]
Hey, its a toll free number, so why not make ourselves heard?
It might let someone know that we actually exist, and someone might actually get some information as to when the funds will be freed, if they are persistant and polite in asking. Or, maybe we can at least be a volumous pain in aswering the phones.
Happy calling, everyone [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I bet if the mafia all called them at once and annoyed the shit out em, that’d really help get the Don off those racketeering charges...

Seriously, since when has a court’s ruling or a prosecutor’s position EVER been influenced by public opinions? You’d just be feeding their ego, reassuring them that this case really DOES have the high-profile visibility to make sure they’ll step up the political food chain.

[/ QUOTE ]

You have IMPRESSED us all with your skillful use of CAPITAL letters to make your random POINTS?? Now please go away and THINK about why you had $23,500 IN Neteller when IT was apparent that things could CHANGE any time??

Cliff Notes: Lose the attitude, grow up, and come back when you're ready to play nicely with others.

[yahboohoo]

Ummm... fu2?

The dude was posting nonsense. Uninvestigated, unthoughtful, unhelpful nonsense.

Love your ATTITUDE though...

[frommagio]

[ QUOTE ]
Ummm... fu2?

The dude was posting nonsense. Uninvestigated, unthoughtful, unhelpful nonsense.

Love your ATTITUDE though...

[/ QUOTE ]

Tell me again, which dude was posting nonsense?

[yahboohoo]

I believe my post was on-topic and raised relevant questions. For instance, if there is a "strategy" published about the NETeller case, I would like to read it. If there is really a phone number I could call, I'd like that number -- not the "nark-on-an-attorney" number.

If you have something meaningful to contribute to this thread or this conversation, please do. Otherwise, keep your ad hominems to YOURSELF, tyvm.

[frommagio]

[ QUOTE ]
I believe my post was on-topic and raised relevant questions. For instance, if there is a "strategy" published about the NETeller case, I would like to read it. If there is really a phone number I could call, I'd like that number -- not the "nark-on-an-attorney" number.

If you have something meaningful to contribute to this thread or this conversation, please do. Otherwise, keep your ad hominems to YOURSELF, tyvm.

[/ QUOTE ]

Funny, I thought your post was a raving, scatter-shot stream of unfocused consciousness that rightfully belongs in the zoo. Maybe that's just me.

If you have anything relevant to add, please do. Hint: it won't involve the mafia, the Don, corrupt US Attorneys, racketeering charges, the ego of the attorneys and the court, or their political aspirations. Furthermore, it will most likely be expressed without creative spelling and capitalization; you might even consider having a coherent theme.

It's an insult to the readership to pretend that your post had any merit. Too late for an edit, my friend. Let's try to improve the content in your next 15 contributions, OK? We don't need another monkey at the keyboard.

Yabbadabbadoo!

[yahboohoo]

So what have we learned?

Bob HATES all capitals.
Bob has nothing to contribute to this discussion.
Bob is the self-appointed Attitude Police.
Bob is also the self-appointed Literary Theme Police.

I'll leave you to enjoy the rest of this thread on your own.