#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Neener trouble
If you are going to squeeze here make it $20, esp. OOP, your goal here should be to take the pot down now, $13 gets it done 0% of the time. As played, Villian has you smoked shoving with another villian to act.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Neener trouble
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Orange, Isn't calling w/99 pretty weak though? [/ QUOTE ] Not really...I like to take a multiway with this hand, RR-ing puts you in all sorts of awkward spots postflop. Even 'good' flops like these can be hell to play in RR-ed pots. [/ QUOTE ] So let's say you just call pf. Now what do you do on this flop... [/ QUOTE ] I think your 99 are a bluff catcher now... and... not a good one at that edit: i mean i think he is repping 77 here correct? if not he is representing a pair TT+, all you beat is a bluff, so decided if you think he is bluffing is all you have left to do at that point... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Neener trouble
$13 is pretty weak sauce with the PFR/caller involved. Aren't you making it $13-$14 if there is just a PFR involved in front of you? Well, you need to make it more with the caller in there.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Neener trouble
c/c flop take it from there. plenty of players will still bet their 66 or whatever.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Neener trouble
<font color="green">orange</font>'<font color="yellow">m</font>,
why would we c/c instead of b/f when our we're vunerable to overs? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Neener trouble
[ QUOTE ]
<font color="green">orange</font>'<font color="yellow">m</font>, why would we c/c instead of b/f when our we're vunerable to overs? [/ QUOTE ] b/f is also okay. i dont think it matters much either way. |
|
|