#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: $27 ROI Challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] oh another question was how do you monitor via sharkscope exactly? if someone plays all different games,etc you cant get anything except an estimate from 'scope. [/ QUOTE ] The advanced search function for subscribers allows filtered searches. [/ QUOTE ] Crap. I am not a subscriber, we would need a third party to post results. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: $27 ROI Challenge
[ QUOTE ]
i also think it should just be for highest roi and thats it. (maybe 75% payout for highest and 25% for 2nd) the other rules just make it an incentive to play a lot (which me and others probably couldnt do) [/ QUOTE ] I don't mind changing the payout structure accordingly. On a side not, are you using the AHK script for Pokerstars? If so, how is it working out? I am 8-tabling now, and it becomes a pain to close all of the silly pop up windows and such... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: $27 ROI Challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] oh another question was how do you monitor via sharkscope exactly? if someone plays all different games,etc you cant get anything except an estimate from 'scope. [/ QUOTE ] The advanced search function for subscribers allows filtered searches. [/ QUOTE ] Crap. I am not a subscriber, we would need a third party to post results. [/ QUOTE ] I will do this for you provided there is not more than like 10 or 15 players involved. You can also get a non-reoccurring subsription fairly cheap. Something like $15 for a month. [Edit for spelling.] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: $27 ROI Challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] oh another question was how do you monitor via sharkscope exactly? if someone plays all different games,etc you cant get anything except an estimate from 'scope. [/ QUOTE ] The advanced search function for subscribers allows filtered searches. [/ QUOTE ] Crap. I am not a subscriber, we would need a third party to post results. [/ QUOTE ] I will do this for you provided there is not more than like 10 or 15 players involved. You can also get a non-reoccurring subsription fairly cheap. Something like $15 for a month. [Edit for spelling.] [/ QUOTE ] Thanks Jbrochu |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: $27 ROI Challenge
You're welcome.
When you get eveything worked out PM me the list of players and how often/where you want me to post the updates. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: $27 ROI Challenge
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i also think it should just be for highest roi and thats it. (maybe 75% payout for highest and 25% for 2nd) the other rules just make it an incentive to play a lot (which me and others probably couldnt do) [/ QUOTE ] I don't mind changing the payout structure accordingly. On a side not, are you using the AHK script for Pokerstars? If so, how is it working out? I am 8-tabling now, and it becomes a pain to close all of the silly pop up windows and such... [/ QUOTE ] im using nothing. i did use it for the middle click all in thinger but it wasnt working vary well so i stopped using it a few months ago |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: $27 ROI Challenge
[ QUOTE ]
You're welcome. When you get eveything worked out PM me the list of players and how often/where you want me to post the updates. [/ QUOTE ] I just took a quick look at the Sharkscope filtered search functions to make sure I could easily do updates and it's not as easy as I thought. I can do a fairly easy update at 1 week and 1 month as the filtered search has an option for these intervals. I can also do the final results but that involves actually downloading all of each players results into an Excel spreadsheet. Then I need to filter within Excel the tournaments played during the period of the challenge and calculate the ROI for the applicable tournaments. I am willing to do this for the final results plus a 1 week and 1 month update but I can't commit the time to update on a weekly basis. (Wife is due with our first child in 2 weeks so I expect some crazy times ahead for a bit.) Let me know what you think. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: $27 ROI Challenge
I'd like to be in this, but i think the payout should be more like 50% for roi, 25% fro most tournies, 25% for most played. the 70,15,15 system doesnt exzactly encourage a lot of play if you run good over your first 1000.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: $27 ROI Challenge
[ QUOTE ]
I'd like to be in this, but i think the payout should be more like 50% for roi, 25% fro most tournies, 25% for most played. the 70,15,15 system doesnt exzactly encourage a lot of play if you run good over your first 1000. [/ QUOTE ] thats why the prop bet should be much less than your BR. the best player is still most likely to win which is all that matters. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OT: $27 ROI Challenge
BUMP
|
|
|