200NL - Thin(?) river value bet with TPJK gets ch/shoved on.

[Isura]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm curious as to why you wouldn't 3-bet in position against a player who seems like he steals often. Not saying you're wrong, just want to hear why.

[/ QUOTE ]

If they steal so much then I think we have more value by calling and using position. If they are tight then I don't mind a reraise. FWIW I reraise here in a CO vs button sitution but the blind battle has a slightly different dynamic because SB will be opening with a tighter range and also won't give us as much credit.

[Kilillan]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm curious as to why you wouldn't 3-bet in position against a player who seems like he steals often. Not saying you're wrong, just want to hear why.

[/ QUOTE ]

we want to use our position to rape him

Oop I'm much more likely to play this repop this

[macstarr]

you got 2 viable options:

check turn for pot control and call OR valuebet river.
raise turn and check OR call river.

the only hand you beat is a huge [censored] bluff.
Though I think you looked him up and saw 22.

[FishSticks]

I don't see a ton of value in betting this river. This doesn't seem like the right spot to pull 3 full streets of value. It's sick when his TT pays you big, but I think I check behind here often.

[SABR42]

I would check the river.

When you start value-betting really thin, you have to be prepared to call bluff-raises. I probably call river as played.