100NL Stat Evaluation: I admit it, I need major help.

[King Spew]

[ QUOTE ]

also, your fold to river bet % seems real high
this could be do to alot of things:
1. chasing draws for too long to give up on river
2. folding good hands too often

[/ QUOTE ]

[adanthar]

wow this forum is still terrible.

10 replies and nobody commented on 18/7. gg.

[Jurrr]

adanthar, so what are proper FR VP$IP/PFR in your opinion?

[Mr_Donktastic]

[ QUOTE ]
wow this forum is still terrible.

10 replies and nobody commented on 18/7. gg.

[/ QUOTE ]

Probably because 18/7 is not far off from what I consider the 'sweet spot' of 20/10, not to mention the other problems (namely not being positionally aware) are about 1000x more important.

Oh - and your attitude sucks.

[D.L.M.]

[ QUOTE ]
wow this forum is still terrible.

10 replies and nobody commented on 18/7. gg.

[/ QUOTE ]
lol yeah you have to have specific numbers to be good. didnt you all know that???

[adanthar]

[ QUOTE ]
adanthar, so what are proper FR VP$IP/PFR in your opinion?

[/ QUOTE ]

nothing that has '7' in it

[ QUOTE ]
Probably because 18/7 is not far off from what I consider the 'sweet spot' of 20/10

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah I mean that's only slightly below 50% off or so, no big deal (not that 20/10 is the sweet spot either, but I guess it might be at NL50-100. edit - at NL400+, every good TAG I've ever seen runs 18/12 or aggro-er.)

he raises, at the most, ~50-70% of the hands he should be in *any* position. I realize you're all nits in here, but forget his UTG play for a minute and realize this guy has probably never raised QJo from anywhere in his life.

but you're right, my attitude sucks and nobody needs 'specific numbers' to be good. go on doing what you were doing.

[NL__Fool]

[ QUOTE ]
not that 20/10 is the sweet spot either, but I guess it might be at NL50-100. edit - at NL400+, every good TAG I've ever seen runs 18/12 or aggro-er.)

[/ QUOTE ]

You realize that what you say is idiotic.

The difference you are talking about is player A (20/10) is Playing 2 more hands per 100 then player B (18/12)

and Player B is raising 2 more hand sper 100 then player A.

If this is what seperates the good TAG from a Bad TAG, then maybe I should go play horshoes or something because I obviously know nothing about poker, even after playing for a living for 3 years.

I will admit that I have been making a living off of 6 max limit poker not NL as I am new to NL but that is still the dumbest thing i hvae read in a while

[1p0kerboy]

[ QUOTE ]
I realize you're all nits in here, but forget his UTG play for a minute and realize this guy has probably never raised QJo from anywhere in his life.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm 14/8 right now (working on improving) and routinely open-raise QJo in the CO and OTB.

[1p0kerboy]

[ QUOTE ]
You realize that what you say is idiotic.

The difference you are talking about is player A (20/10) is Playing 2 more hands per 100 then player B (18/12)

and Player B is raising 2 more hand sper 100 then player A.

If this is what seperates the good TAG from a Bad TAG, then maybe I should go play horshoes or something because I obviously know nothing about poker, even after playing for a living for 3 years.

[/ QUOTE ]

This was funny.

[D.L.M.]

hmmm i dont always open with that hand, if there is a station right behind me i wont, but if i have tags behind me ill open with it. or if i have a limper ill limp it, but does that count as an open raise if there was a limper?