One possible solution

[AbreuTime]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I see no upside to the scenario presented, outside of your hatred for people who multitable.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're an idiot.

Get over it, nobody is going to provide you with a fish farm.

[img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]


Tuff

[/ QUOTE ]
For someone who admittedly hates online poker and is looking forward to its demise (I could go back and quote some of your past posts, but I just don't feel like it), you spent an awful lot of time thinking up alternatives. LOL at you trying to think up a system where you think you'll be able to actually win...

But go on. How do you REALLY feel about people that multitable?

[1C5]

That is so gay.

Stick to making videos. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[Tuff_Fish]

[ QUOTE ]


Exactly. They would lose far more money by restricting to one table because they would have less tables running and then less rake given. Multitabling "hudbots" provide tons of rake to online poker rooms.

-nation

[/ QUOTE ]

The online poker rooms of today have one goal. To get as much rake a quickly as possible. They have zero interest in the long term health of the online industry. They are doing just fine raking you multitabling hudbots.

Prediction: When/if online poker becomes "legal" in the US (spare me the crap about online poker is already legal, you are full of shi*), with freedom to advertise, the overseas sites will die. Futhermore, the US site(s) that DOES restrict the tables to one or two will be the one(s) that prospers. Fish don't want to play with sharks. If they know where to go so as to avoid sharks, at least tables full of sharks, they will.

Cry me a ufcking river. No more fish, bahawww. If you are doing so well in the current climate STFU and continue playing.

Tuff

[ongo30]

tuff,

you seem to know a lot about hudbots. I don't know anything about them. I believe that you are talking about people using poker tracker, and tracking all the players then going after them.

Are these players primarily the ones playing 5 tables in lower level limit holdem games? Also do you have any strategy to counter these players?

Please fill me in on why you hate these so called hud bots so much.

[Tuff_Fish]

[ QUOTE ]
I dont want to waste my time with why, but this is the worst idea ever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please, waste your time. Why is it bad? Would it be good if you could multitable to your hearts content?

What would be your ideal scenerio? How would it work?

Inquiring minds would like to know.

Tuff

[mntbikr15]

It wont change anything, the sharks would still play if the games were that soft.

You and all of those like you would still get fleeced.

[Tuff_Fish]

[ QUOTE ]


Please fill me in on why you hate these so called hud bots so much.

[/ QUOTE ]

It is simple. Two reasons.

First and foremost, as I have oft stated, I HATE having to wait while the clock winds down and some nimrod multitabler finally gets around to folding. Then the ufckhead behind him does the same thing.

Question: How exactly does the pokersite make more rake when the tables are in stasis 70% of the time? And how does tight nitty fold 85% of your hands generate rake?

Secondly: The multitabling sharks destroy the fish pool. The lying ufcks bragging that they are still cleaning up on the fish are completely full of it. A few may be running hot for a bit, but mostly I see threads complaining about how tight the tables are. (And this was before the crap hit the fan)

The genuine fish have long since departed the scene, mostly to never return.

To the haters and a$$holes that keep calling me names and saying how much I suck. I am still around on PokerStars in the $1/2 games, and I don't hide from search. Enjoy.

Tuff

[adanthar]

[ QUOTE ]
Prediction: When/if online poker becomes "legal" in the US (spare me the crap about online poker is already legal, you are full of shi*), with freedom to advertise, the overseas sites will die. Futhermore, the US site(s) that DOES restrict the tables to one or two will be the one(s) that prospers. Fish don't want to play with sharks. If they know where to go so as to avoid sharks, at least tables full of sharks, they will.

[/ QUOTE ]

There has already been one room that did restrict you to one table at a time. It was called Pacific Poker. It did so well that when it upgraded its software to handle multiple tables, its playerbase immediately increased from 1 person to 3.

Another room still does stop people at 3 tables and only recently got any kind of PT support. It's called Bodog. Bodog is a nice site that is, admittedly, on the fishy side. Oddly enough, though, the multitabling HUDbots you refer to have no problem playing and winning tons of money without PT (at least, all of my friends did). Also, oddly enough, this limiting of its customers to 3 tables did not make Bodog the most popular site on the Internet overnight.

Perhaps you should rethink this position.

edit: For the record, last month, I played at non-Stars (non-PT) and had my winningest cash month ever by a large margin.

[morphball]

Tuff - no disrespect, but I don't think your idea is very feasible.

Also, if you can't beat them, join them. PTH and PAHUD combined cost less than one buy-in for anything above uNL.

Cheers.

[nation]

first of all, you're exaggerating how long it takes for people to act. its not in stasis 70% of the time as you state. your claims are ludicrous. the rooms benefit far more from letting people multitable than letting the few players who would stick around just play one.

second, i defended your actions in the past thread you made, but now you have crossed a line. your posts are very trollish and are bringing no value to these forums. you idea does nothing to serve the PARTICIPANTS OF THIS BOARD.

we do not care about the fish who play one table, or people who are too slow to play more than one like you. we care about ourselves, and making money. your idea only serves fish who want to have fun while playing. that is NOT the intent of this board, so don't confuse the two. again, we are all here to learn how to get better in order to make more money.

"Cry me a ufcking river. No more fish, bahawww. If you are doing so well in the current climate STFU and continue playing."

start making positive contributions instead of your whiny posts like the one above. no one cares about how you can't beat the games if there are multitabling tags around. you are just another fish, bottom line. you are NOT a celebrity. you were funny at one point, mostly when we were laughing AT you, not WITH you. once you realized people watched you and started faking it, it stopped being funny. in short, you have become a terrible poster, and bring no worth to 2+2.

-nation