#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Four to a flush...bet river?
Reread the hand. TT, QQ, or AQ with no diamond will raise the flop and bet the turn and river here??
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Four to a flush...bet river?
This guy was actually not such a decent TAG. I had only played about 30 or so hands with him, but he seemed to be tighter than a good TAG should be. This led me to think that he'd be hard pressed to call a river bet if he had a K, so check it was.
But if I am villain with AK<no diamond>, as a good TAG, I'm wondering if calling is the right play. I'd like to see some numbers on this, because this is definitely close. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Four to a flush...bet river?
you're right.....I guess I've been playing too many games with too many bluffers, I don't know who's got what anymore [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Raised on flop, raised on turn, raised on river, and dude turns over Ac6c..... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Four to a flush...bet river?
[ QUOTE ]
This guy was actually not such a decent TAG. I had only played about 30 or so hands with him, but he seemed to be tighter than a good TAG should be. This led me to think that he'd be hard pressed to call a river bet if he had a K, so check it was. But if I am villain with AK<no diamond>, as a good TAG, I'm wondering if calling is the right play. I'd like to see some numbers on this, because this is definitely close. [/ QUOTE ] If you're villain with AK no diamond, you suck bad at poker based on how he played his hand. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Four to a flush...bet river?
I dunno, tough call but id actually probabily check..
Facts we know: 1)Villain has shown no strength up to this point in the hand. 2) Decent TAG raises UTG, that means his range is around 66+, KJ+, A9+, JTs, QJs, KTs+ 3) He's checked the river, making it a little less likely he has a strong diamond. On the flop/turn, The hands that think they're probabily good but should play passivly are hands with a jack ,QQ . Unfortunatly we have two jacks so it makes him having a jack far less likely. He played very passivly/poorly for a hand with a king in it, so I doubt he has a king. There are also a lot of hands in his distirbution with a diamond that can get to the river on a draw. Conclusion: Had he been more agressive on the flop/turn, I would actually be more inclined to value bet the river here. But because he's been more passive on a board where there's not much to be passive with other than a medium diamond draw, i'd check. IMO I can't think of a single hand that he could have where the way he played it is the best play (and will call a river bet). |
|
|