Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > High Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-30-2007, 02:53 PM
wdead wdead is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,323
Default Re: 10/20 I lack basic fundamentals

[ QUOTE ]
c/r or c/f turn depending on reads, not an easy decision which to do by any means, c/c sucks tho given stacks

[/ QUOTE ]

yea prob right
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-30-2007, 03:02 PM
Jason Strasser (strassa2) Jason Strasser (strassa2) is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: durham
Posts: 4,912
Default Re: 10/20 I lack basic fundamentals

The important thing to realize here when making this decision is that your call w/ AQ is probabbly extremely similar to calling with 88, on the turn, given a likely range of hands. You might see a worse ace once in a while, but understand that AQ only really beats a bluff given this action at 10-20, (at higher stakes people will value worse sometimes) so try not to get caught up with the fact you have AQ.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-30-2007, 03:19 PM
Phresh Phresh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I Like Toffifay.
Posts: 3,475
Default Re: 10/20 I lack basic fundamentals

[ QUOTE ]
c/r or c/f turn depending on reads, not an easy decision which to do by any means, c/c sucks tho given stacks

[/ QUOTE ]

Why does c/c suck because of stacks? Is it because if we're check-calling here, it's because we think we're ahead, and since Villain will only have $500 left behind in a $1600 pot, we should just shove since he's never folding?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-30-2007, 03:34 PM
Get_better_Baris Get_better_Baris is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 3 BaRReLing yOUr MoMmA FoO
Posts: 692
Default Re: 10/20 I lack basic fundamentals

because he is unlikly to bluff river and we charge him for draws and he will call with alot
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-30-2007, 03:48 PM
cts cts is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 5,208
Default Re: 10/20 I lack basic fundamentals

If he's only got $1300 I never fold this at any point.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-30-2007, 03:54 PM
Phresh Phresh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I Like Toffifay.
Posts: 3,475
Default Re: 10/20 I lack basic fundamentals

[ QUOTE ]
because he is unlikly to bluff river and we charge him for draws and he will call with alot

[/ QUOTE ]

How isn't this what I said?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:39 PM
BobboFitos BobboFitos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Somerville
Posts: 10,043
Default Re: 10/20 I lack basic fundamentals

[ QUOTE ]
If he's only got $1300 I never fold this at any point.

[/ QUOTE ]

yah. tp2k for 65bb in a raised blind battle... next hand.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-30-2007, 05:57 PM
THE RISE THE RISE is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 21
Default Re: 10/20 I lack basic fundamentals

blind vs blind AQ top pair vs shortstack = ship it
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-30-2007, 06:44 PM
xX zorrito Xx xX zorrito Xx is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Default Re: 10/20 I lack basic fundamentals

pot size beting the pot was the first mistake...

i probably would've folded on the turn based on the bet and how much of his stack he has bet
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-30-2007, 06:54 PM
ActionJeff ActionJeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: though my mind could think I still was a mad man
Posts: 1,467
Default Re: 10/20 I lack basic fundamentals

I 3-bet shove flop.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.