#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for stacks w AT?
this hand is retarded. it is totally read dependent and chances are your "hero" got lucky based on his equally retarded analysis.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for stacks w AT?
Weak tight villain probably folded AJ/AQ type hand fearing two pair by AK.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for stacks w AT?
spew.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for stacks w AT?
I am thinking AQ/AJ/A4/A2 or even, villain being a nit, 22/44 seeing monsters under the bed thinking AA/KK is a huge part of hero's pfr range here.
But yeah, all in all it just seems overly retarded... |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for stacks w AT?
In general this is obviously spew but I wouldn't say it's always incorrect.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for stacks w AT?
If you think he's bluffing, why are you betting the turn? C/R him if that's the case.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for stacks w AT?
"I" am not betting the turn?
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Playing for stacks w AT?
And even so, c/c would be way better than c/r IMO.
|
|
|