Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-18-2007, 03:38 PM
mythrilfox mythrilfox is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 1,428
Default Re: Playing for stacks w AT?

this hand is retarded. it is totally read dependent and chances are your "hero" got lucky based on his equally retarded analysis.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-18-2007, 03:42 PM
JohnnyG33 JohnnyG33 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 16
Default Re: Playing for stacks w AT?

Weak tight villain probably folded AJ/AQ type hand fearing two pair by AK.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-18-2007, 03:59 PM
Hattifnatt Hattifnatt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: FT
Posts: 8,202
Default Re: Playing for stacks w AT?

spew.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-18-2007, 04:01 PM
SwedishMedusah SwedishMedusah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Retard Camp
Posts: 233
Default Re: Playing for stacks w AT?

I am thinking AQ/AJ/A4/A2 or even, villain being a nit, 22/44 seeing monsters under the bed thinking AA/KK is a huge part of hero's pfr range here.

But yeah, all in all it just seems overly retarded...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-18-2007, 04:07 PM
Jamougha Jamougha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Learning to read the board
Posts: 9,246
Default Re: Playing for stacks w AT?

In general this is obviously spew but I wouldn't say it's always incorrect.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-18-2007, 04:18 PM
dtan05 dtan05 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: whining in MSNL
Posts: 3,112
Default Re: Playing for stacks w AT?

If you think he's bluffing, why are you betting the turn? C/R him if that's the case.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-18-2007, 04:23 PM
SwedishMedusah SwedishMedusah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Retard Camp
Posts: 233
Default Re: Playing for stacks w AT?

"I" am not betting the turn?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-18-2007, 06:05 PM
SwedishMedusah SwedishMedusah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Retard Camp
Posts: 233
Default Re: Playing for stacks w AT?

And even so, c/c would be way better than c/r IMO.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.