ZeeJustin mentioned in Card Player as contender for POY

[WelshMackem]

[ QUOTE ]
I believe the sites should have been responsible for preventing this in the first place.

[/ QUOTE ]

I reckon rapists and murderers get too hard a time of it, the police should have been responsible for preventing this in the first place.

[adanthar]

[ QUOTE ]
It's amazing how many big buy in events you can attend when you do it with funds derived by cheating.

[/ QUOTE ]

I know, it's odd how much negative several thousand dollars buys these days

[Howard Treesong]

[ QUOTE ]
It's amazing how many big buy in events you can attend when you do it with funds derived by cheating.

[/ QUOTE ]

Have you actually read ZJ's site or looked at his results? There is every reason to think that he's a profitable player even apart from his cheating. I'm no fanboy: I think he was dead flat wrong to multiaccount, and he appears to be more than sufficiently smart that I have very very little doubt that he knew precisely what he was doing all along. That said, his poker thinking seems very solid, and he has had terrific results in live play so far.

I don't know if the money that party and stars confiscated is more than what he gained cheating. Neither, I suspect, do you.

OP: a site's failure to police multiaccounting in no way justifies doing it.

[goodsamaritan]

[ QUOTE ]
I found it interesting how Card Player didn't cover him cheating especially since it is a tabloid magazine. I don't think I've heard it mentioned anywhere but 2+2

[/ QUOTE ]

Card Player is a fluff magazine. They avoid controversy and serious discussion at all costs

[captZEEbo]

I BET ZEEJUSTIN WILL WIN POY BY MULTIACCOUNTING THE LIVE CIRCUITZ LOL

[wpr101]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I believe the sites should have been responsible for preventing this in the first place.

[/ QUOTE ]

I reckon rapists and murderers get too hard a time of it, the police should have been responsible for preventing this in the first place.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, Etrade and your bank should not be responsible for fraud when a basic security measure is breached. Because they had no way of knowing they were responsible for security of your money.

[Burno]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I believe the sites should have been responsible for preventing this in the first place.

[/ QUOTE ]

I reckon rapists and murderers get too hard a time of it, the police should have been responsible for preventing this in the first place.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, Etrade and your bank should not be responsible for fraud when a basic security measure is breached. Because they had no way of knowing they were responsible for security of your money.

[/ QUOTE ]

Curious you responded to this poster's quote of your illogical statement though I quoted it earlier and in direct response. While its certainly feasible you simply saw his first, perhaps it made for an easier post in defense of your statement, with his stretch of an analogy. Good thing you set him straight with yours, with its ironclad logic and unquestionable applicability.


Try this one. The sites don't block instant message programs during play. So I really shouldn't be held responsible for colluding with my buddy to rob you, right?

[wpr101]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I believe the sites should have been responsible for preventing this in the first place.

[/ QUOTE ]

I reckon rapists and murderers get too hard a time of it, the police should have been responsible for preventing this in the first place.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, Etrade and your bank should not be responsible for fraud when a basic security measure is breached. Because they had no way of knowing they were responsible for security of your money.

[/ QUOTE ]

Curious you responded to this poster's quote of your illogical statement though I quoted it earlier and in direct response. While its certainly feasible you simply saw his first, perhaps it made for an easier post in defense of your statement, with his stretch of an analogy. Good thing you set him straight with yours, with its ironclad logic and unquestionable applicability.


Try this one. The sites don't block instant message programs during play. So I really shouldn't be held responsible for colluding with my buddy to rob you, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

My logic doesn't need to make sense. This is NVG and we are discussing the greatest tournament player of all time.