#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Funny
[ QUOTE ]
the rules are.....THERE ARE NO RULES1!1 [/ QUOTE ] But I thought you liked rules? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Funny
[ QUOTE ]
What's BBV4Life? [/ QUOTE ] OOT Junior |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Funny
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] What's BBV4Life? [/ QUOTE ] OOT Junior [/ QUOTE ] Oot for tots. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Funny
Stabn,
nice. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Funny
[ QUOTE ]
It's just amusing that there was so much pressure against the idea of creating any type of "Locker Room" forums, yet now we have both the super popular BBV and the brand new BBV4LIFE. [/ QUOTE ] Do you really classify the standard BBV content as NSFW? I've never gotten that impression and haven't heard others describe the fourm in that way. I don't think any forum on 2+2 comes close to being a NSFW forum. A NSFW forum would be one focused primarily on sexual content- especially with images and pornagraphic links. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Funny
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's just amusing that there was so much pressure against the idea of creating any type of "Locker Room" forums, yet now we have both the super popular BBV and the brand new BBV4LIFE. [/ QUOTE ] Do you really classify the standard BBV content as NSFW? I've never gotten that impression and haven't heard others describe the fourm in that way. I don't think any forum on 2+2 comes close to being a NSFW forum. A NSFW forum would be one focused primarily on sexual content- especially with images and pornagraphic links. [/ QUOTE ] Now that we have it defined, we are that much closer to creation! |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Funny
Dynasty,
A number of us a while back pushed for a SFW "locker room" type forum. You and others said this was not a viable option for a number of reasons. I find it amusing that BBV effectively turned into that forum. That's all. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Funny
[ QUOTE ]
A number of us a while back pushed for a SFW "locker room" type forum. You and others said this was not a viable option for a number of reasons. [/ QUOTE ] In the link you provided, it seems clear I was saying a NSFW forum would not be allowed. Later in that thread, I provided a post from Mason which was the basis for what I was saying. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Funny
Dynasty,
Out of fairness you said "remotely". To me that would include written descriptions of acts which if portrayed in video/pictures would be considered porn. |
|
|