Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > Special Sklansky Forum
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-06-2006, 06:15 PM
chopchoi chopchoi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,166
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

I once got rolled up 5's back to back in 7 stud, what're the odds of that?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-06-2006, 07:06 PM
mjkidd mjkidd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Supporting Ron Paul!
Posts: 1,517
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

[ QUOTE ]
I once got rolled up 5's back to back in 7 stud, what're the odds of that?

[/ QUOTE ]

Somewhat worse than 7-1
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-06-2006, 07:12 PM
David Sklansky David Sklansky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,092
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

[ QUOTE ]
DS,

We have a book forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm more likely to get involved here.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-06-2006, 07:34 PM
jogsxyz jogsxyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,167
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

What about subscripts? Can you program this forum to accept subscripts?

Xn


Doesn't seem to work.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-06-2006, 07:56 PM
Kimbell175113 Kimbell175113 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The art of losing isn\'t hard to master.
Posts: 2,464
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

David,

This question isn't that great, but it's probably less disappointing than most of the others. I ordered the book from amazon almost a month ago, and it has been delayed a few times. Do you know anything about this? problems with supply, shipping, whatev?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-06-2006, 07:57 PM
Phanekim Phanekim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 515
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

craziest thing that happened to me is a guy getting kings four straight times in a live game. He got it 3rd time...they changed the deck and he got it again. He literally busted the entire table...at least it broke up aftewards.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-11-2006, 10:56 AM
TheFisherKing TheFisherKing is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 14
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
DS,

We have a book forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm more likely to get involved here.

[/ QUOTE ]


LOL. Oh so desperate...
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-11-2006, 11:19 AM
HoneyBadger HoneyBadger is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 2,585
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

[ QUOTE ]

You were only off about 7 orders of magnitude. That's not so much, in the grand scheme of things.

[/ QUOTE ]
Although an accurate estimate, properly it's this:

I'll use the notation (x y) for "x over y", which is x!/((x-y)!*y!), or combinations.

First, you need to be dealt 2 deuces: (4 2) / (52 2). That is, 2 cards out of 4 good cards, out of 52 total.

Second, you need the complement chance of the flop not showing a deuce: 1 - ((48 3) / (50 3)). That is 3 cards out of 48 good cards (50 remaining minus 2 deuces) out of 50 total.

Then you can multiply all this and raise it to the 3rd power for it to happen 3 times in a row.

(4 2) = 4!/2!*2! = 4*3/2 = 6
(52 2) = 52*51/2 = 1326
(48 3) = (48*47*46)/(3*2) = 17296
(50 3) = (50*49*48)/6 = 19600

Gives: (6/1326) * (1 - (17296/19600)) = 0.0045248 * (1-0.88244) = 0.000531935.

That's the probability of it happening once, 3 times it's: 0.000531935^3 = 1.51*10^-10. Or about one in 6,643,900,265. (that's rounded)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-11-2006, 09:39 PM
UATrewqaz UATrewqaz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 5,542
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

1. Have you read the book yet?

2. How do you rate it on a 1-10 scale (rounded to nearest .25 multiple)

3. Will the book prove itself immediately useful for limit or NL hold em?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-11-2006, 11:05 PM
flipdeadshot22 flipdeadshot22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 905
Default Re: Special Thread For Chen-Ankenman Mathematics of Poker

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

You were only off about 7 orders of magnitude. That's not so much, in the grand scheme of things.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol, are you [censored] high? go read the "verizon puts a 71$ beat on someone" thread in BBV, and realize that your level of stupidity is up there with the average verizon service rep.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.