|
|
#11
12-05-2006, 03:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($27) KQ in the BB to UTG limp on the bubble
[ QUOTE ]
Considering your stack and your read on his donkishness, you might very well be up against a suited ace or a small PP which he will eventually call. A medium Ace A8s/A9o+ would be good. [/ QUOTE ] Would he not more likely raise a small pp or suited A given he's 50 / 22? 
|
|
#12
12-05-2006, 03:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ($27) KQ in the BB to UTG limp on the bubble
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Absent the PF raise from this guy, I would certainly look to go broke c-shoving a favorable flop. [/ QUOTE ] PF Raise? [/ QUOTE ] Absent..as in there wasn't one. Where favorable would certainly be a TP - absent villian's PF raise.
|
|
#13
12-05-2006, 03:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ($27) KQ in the BB to UTG limp on the bubble
Ahead of his range isn't the biggest factor. With 8 blinds (serving as a +, not a -), we don't want a caller. The disparity between the non-monster stacks isn't great enough to "welcome" a call from this guy. A few hundred less chips maybe. Someone break out wiz and see what limp/shove-calling ranges look like.
|
|
#15
12-05-2006, 03:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ($27) KQ in the BB to UTG limp on the bubble
[ QUOTE ]
Ahead of his range isn't the biggest factor. With 8 blinds (serving as a +, not a -), we don't want a caller. The disparity between the non-monster stacks isn't great enough to "welcome" a call from this guy. A few hundred less chips maybe. Someone break out wiz and see what limp/shove-calling ranges look like. [/ QUOTE ] Bluefeet....obviously getting called would be bad, but don't you think villan usually folds this?
|
|
#16
12-05-2006, 03:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ($27) KQ in the BB to UTG limp on the bubble
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Absent the PF raise from this guy, I would certainly look to go broke c-shoving a favorable flop. [/ QUOTE ] PF Raise? [/ QUOTE ] Absent..as in there wasn't one. Where favorable would certainly be a TP - absent villian's PF raise. [/ QUOTE ] Cheers for clearing that up bluefeet. Was just checking you didnt read the OP as stating a raise. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] What would OPs stack need to be for you to push this?
|
|
#17
12-05-2006, 03:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ($27) KQ in the BB to UTG limp on the bubble
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ahead of his range isn't the biggest factor. With 8 blinds (serving as a +, not a -), we don't want a caller. The disparity between the non-monster stacks isn't great enough to "welcome" a call from this guy. A few hundred less chips maybe. Someone break out wiz and see what limp/shove-calling ranges look like. [/ QUOTE ] Bluefeet....obviously getting called would be bad, but don't you think villan usually folds this? [/ QUOTE ] From a 50%'r? Not in my experience...not with his stack...not enough anyway. I can run sngwiz when I get home.
|
|
#19
12-05-2006, 03:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ($27) KQ in the BB to UTG limp on the bubble
I shove this. You are the short stack, they're no other shorties, you have a moron playing 50% of hands in the pot, your hand crushes his range, he'll prolly just fold, and if he does call you prolly aren't in that bad of shape. That was a lot of commas.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
