Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-29-2006, 03:11 PM
Entity Entity is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: DeucesCracked!
Posts: 15,310
Default Re: $50-$100, standard hand?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
standard. can you fold to a 3-bet on the river?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you should. You're not beating much and he wasn't described as a LAG.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you absolutely cannot fold to a 3 bet in a 50/100 online game vs a flop donker on that board.

-DeathDonkey

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure what exactly you're putting him on that plays like this. Most people capable of bet-3betting the river as a busted draw bluff wouldn't play diamonds like this on the first two streets, yes?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-29-2006, 07:15 PM
Kwaz Kwaz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: On holidays. Again.
Posts: 5,191
Default Re: $50-$100, standard hand?

I agree with a fold to 3bet.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-29-2006, 11:52 PM
Surf Surf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Blogging
Posts: 5,619
Default Re: $50-$100, standard hand?

[ QUOTE ]
I agree with a fold to 3bet.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-30-2006, 02:40 AM
Dane S Dane S is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 4,453
Default Re: $50-$100, standard hand?

Wow, I definitely have seen too many whacko 3bets to consider letting this one go against a player described as donkish, especially considering the turn went check, check.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-30-2006, 06:33 AM
DeathDonkey DeathDonkey is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: DeucesCracked - Serious Game
Posts: 6,426
Default Re: $50-$100, standard hand?

[ QUOTE ]
Wow, I definitely have seen too many whacko 3bets to consider letting this one go against a player described as donkish, especially considering the turn went check, check.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is my argument. The hand is too murky for both our hands to be well-defined enough that a donkish player couldn't misread us and 3 bet here with something we beat.

-DeathDonkey
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-30-2006, 11:12 AM
Trix Trix is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Folding for 1$/hand..
Posts: 6,890
Default Re: Results

I dont get it. Hero´s range is very different here than if he bet the turn. Villian really should worry about 88 now, but shouldn´t consider it much otherwise.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.