Hmmmmmmmmmmm (aka PokerStars is Ri*$%@#!!)

[___1___]

[ QUOTE ]
Whoops I just realized that you're saying you only made 5852 pairs, which is 4 standard devs away. No, that's pretty unlikely. But its close enough that you should double-check my numbers. Are you sure that there's not some kind of filtering going on with these numbers? Could you be missing any hands at all, even walks from the blinds or something?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, no filtering at all. I've also received all my HHs. Sounds like 4 SD's is corrrect. Hmmmmmm.

Also, any idea how often I should have straights, flushes, and full houses as I think I'm way off on those as well? Can't seem to find krishan's old HUSH post.

Thanks for the legwork with this, disjunction.

___1___

[disjunction]

[ QUOTE ]

No, no filtering at all. I've also received all my HHs. Sounds like 4 SD's is corrrect. Hmmmmmm.
Also, any idea how often I should have straights, flushes, and full houses as I think I'm way off on those as well? Can't seem to find krishan's old HUSH post.

Thanks for the legwork with this, disjunction.

___1___

[/ QUOTE ]

No problem. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Heh, I do happen to have krishan's old thread bookmarked. I seem to recall krishan changing his mind about this post later on. Maybe he just changed his mind about its usefulness? Of course, it's a little less concrete since you could always argue that the players on Stars see showdown at a different frequency.

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...e=0#Post2796877

[Equal]

Looks like if u excluded 22, adding 477 pairs of deuces would put you right around the mark.

[Anders]

[ QUOTE ]
Whoops I just realized that you're saying you only made 5852 pairs, which is 4 standard devs away.

[/ QUOTE ]

No 22 shown, it's probably closer to 3.

[bigt2k4]

100,016 hands on Prima should have 5883.29 pairs, and each one 452.56 times.
Instead I got this

[___1___]

[ QUOTE ]
No 22 shown, it's probably closer to 3.

[/ QUOTE ]

22 isn't shown just b/c PT can't show all 13 pairs. It's still added into that total though.

___1___

[disjunction]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Whoops I just realized that you're saying you only made 5852 pairs, which is 4 standard devs away.

[/ QUOTE ]

No 22 shown, it's probably closer to 3.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think 22 is included, and 22 is just off the screenshot since the others add up to 5400 or so. Also note that each pair is considerably less than the 574 expected.

[___1___]

[ QUOTE ]
Looks like if u excluded 22, adding 477 pairs of deuces would put you right around the mark.

[/ QUOTE ]

22 is part of the total

___1___

[___1___]

[ QUOTE ]
I think 22 is included, and 22 is just off the screenshot since the others add up to 5400 or so. Also note that each pair is considerably less than the 574 expected.

[/ QUOTE ]

You mean, ~477 expected right?

[bigt2k4]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Whoops I just realized that you're saying you only made 5852 pairs, which is 4 standard devs away. No, that's pretty unlikely. But its close enough that you should double-check my numbers. Are you sure that there's not some kind of filtering going on with these numbers? Could you be missing any hands at all, even walks from the blinds or something?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, no filtering at all. I've also received all my HHs. Sounds like 4 SD's is corrrect. Hmmmmmm.

Also, any idea how often I should have straights, flushes, and full houses as I think I'm way off on those as well? Can't seem to find krishan's old HUSH post.

Thanks for the legwork with this, disjunction.

___1___

[/ QUOTE ]

The SD's are for each pair not the total