table selection

[Xhad]

Yeah, I guess my thing is that I don't really see the need to crush .5/1 limit at the expense of learning to play against tougher opposition. It's definitely more +EV in the long run to learn to beat 2/4 than it is to tack an extra .5BB onto your 1/2 winrate, assuming you're trying to move up and play for more meaningful stakes.

[halpgr]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
imo if your table selection below 3/6 full is anything more than "man this table sucks, I think I'll leave" then you're concentrating on the wrong things.

[/ QUOTE ]
I respectfully disagree. Table selection is important. I can be the difference between a game you can beat and a game you can crush.

[/ QUOTE ]
Uh, I believe that's what he's saying. It should be clear after playing a few hands at a table if the table is too tight. At 5c/10c there's no reason to play at tight tables unless you actually want to. The OP is specifically looking for loose passive max profit tables.

Riku, I'd suggest join the table with the largest flop percentage. If that table is full then go on the waiting list as there is a lot of turnover at 5c/10c and it is worth waiting and watching for max 5 minutes getting reads. After you sit down if the table goes tight [usually because the 2-3 fish left or busted] and starts folding around to the button and blinds then just get up and leave and repeat the cycle of highest flop percentage.

[Battle_Boi]

The highest possible VPIP (players to the flop)
The lowest possible PFR (pre flop raises)
The highest possible "go to showdown rate"
The Lower the Postflop-Agression factors of the players the better

My dream table looks like this 60% VPIP 2% PFR 40% WTSD.

You dont need to worry about getting sucked out, that is THE STUPID asummption many good players have. You want the whole world to call always with everything.