|
|
#11
11-10-2006, 12:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FTP Answers 11/10
[ QUOTE ]
As soon as you add resizeable tables you are going to take away the majority of my play from stars. (2K hands $400NL)a day. Please hurry. [/ QUOTE ] Same Here, please implement this 
|
|
#12
11-10-2006, 12:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP Answers 11/10
Doug,
How about observer spam reporting built into the client? It'd be nice if we could just right click on a spammy comment and report it.
|
|
#13
11-10-2006, 01:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP Answers 11/10
Hey Doug, I saw the full ring 100/200 game a few days after my post. Thanks.
|
|
#14
11-10-2006, 01:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP Answers 11/10
Do you have an ETA on when more items will be added to the points store?
I like the site a lot, keep up the good work.
|
|
#15
11-10-2006, 01:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP Answers 11/10
I played a little bit every day last month to qualify for the Iron-Man freeroll (this Saturday I believe).
It's an okay deal but nothing spectacular. But it didn't take much effort to be in it so I guess it's somewhat balanced. Will be approximately $100 in tourney-value for 'only' $25 off my rakeback (and I was clearing bonus and RB throughout...and it doesn't take very long each day to qualify for this). But the lag and discons I was getting were super annoying. And even though I'll be playing the tourney I still feel kind of odd 'paying' around $25 off my rake-back to be part of the Iron-Man 'free'-roll. I haven't played there a single day this month. I was thinking of cranking out the rest of the 10k point requirement to have a shot at the 7-seat Aussie freeroll thing. But with the issues I had just hanging onto the tables there it's just not worth it I don't think. I might check it out again though. Still have time to try to get there.
|
|
#16
11-10-2006, 01:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP Answers 11/10
[ QUOTE ]
As soon as you add resizeable tables you are going to take away the majority of my play from stars. (2K hands $400NL)a day. Please hurry. [/ QUOTE ] PLEASE ADD I TYPE IN CAPS BECAUSE IT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE seriously, who cares about freerolls...people want to be able to see what their doing without having another monitor. If you want to be competitive with stars, this is a no-brainer must-do asap.
|
|
#18
11-10-2006, 02:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP Answers 11/10
You have cap NL games. You have a wide variety of NL levels to play at.
Please raise the minimum buy-in at NL tables. 20bb's is way too low. Please raise the default buy-in at NL tables. Have it at 100bb's, like Party did (does). Please do something about the annoying chat spam that happens every few minutes it seems.
|
|
#19
11-10-2006, 02:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP Answers 11/10
I don't know much about how poker-clients work, etc.
But it seems logical to me that they couldn't put in the resizeable tables BEFORE addressing the lag issues. Resizeable tables is just ANOTHER feature that could just cause even more problems with their site I suspect. Currently, they say they can't even leave the table-filter up there because of the lag/discon probs. Plus, resizeable tables would bring in more multi-tabling traffic from guys who REALLY want it (like pokahjokah mentioned) causing even more strain on their servers.
|
|
#20
11-10-2006, 03:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: FTP Answers 11/10
For the deep stack lovers (mostly in other threads), I've spent all day getting a new feature in for you.
New deep stack NL ring games. 50 big blind minimum, with a 200 big blind maximum. The table name will have a "(deep)" or "(deep 6)" added to the end. You can find them at the following stakes: $0.15/$.30 $.40/$.80 $1.50/$3 $4/$8 $15/$30 $150/$300 Tables are being created now.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
