Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-27-2006, 11:48 PM
dkgojackets dkgojackets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Georgia Tech
Posts: 1,851
Default Re: Changes to baseball

[ QUOTE ]
Can anyone explain why the league has a 16-team NL and 14-team AL? If I'm not mistaken, it has to do with the scheduling, correct?

The way I see it, wouldn't it be easier to have 6 5-team divisions and play X games vs division opponents and 2/3-1/2X games against non-division opponents and eliminate the wild card?

[/ QUOTE ]

You have to have an even number of teams in each league so each team can play every day.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-27-2006, 11:50 PM
dkgojackets dkgojackets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Georgia Tech
Posts: 1,851
Default Re: Changes to baseball

[ QUOTE ]
Really, screw PLAYING to decide the winner. They should just have fans and sportswriters vote for the champs. This is a democracy, BTW.

[/ QUOTE ]

How bout a system where a bunch of guys pause their Dungeons and Dragons game, put some numbers into the computer, and have it spit out who should play for the championship?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-27-2006, 11:51 PM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 16,088
Default Re: Changes to baseball

If you want the best system to determine who wins the championship, you wouldn't have a post-season at all. You'd simply give the championship to the team who wins the most regular season games (with every team playing each other the same # of times).
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-27-2006, 11:52 PM
Dynasty Dynasty is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 16,088
Default Re: Changes to baseball

[ QUOTE ]
I could even live with shortening the regular season by 4 games, making the 1st round of the playoffs best of 7 and the WS best of 9.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do that for 10 years and fans will start saying that all series should be best of 9 and not just the World Series. Meanwhile, there will be growing sentiment for a best of 11 World Series.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-27-2006, 11:56 PM
agent_fish agent_fish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 810
Default Re: Changes to baseball

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I could even live with shortening the regular season by 4 games, making the 1st round of the playoffs best of 7 and the WS best of 9.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do that for 10 years and fans will start saying that all series should be best of 9 and not just the World Series. Meanwhile, there will be growing sentiment for a best of 11 World Series.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think a 23 game series would be best. That way the for real best team would win.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-28-2006, 12:02 AM
J_V J_V is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,611
Default Re: Changes to baseball

Im pretty sure that the point of postseason is to crown the best team world champions (hopefully). Other sports don't have the extreme parity of baseball, and baseball should deal with this by making the series longer. I'm sure money and unions would get in the way somehow though.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-28-2006, 12:06 AM
ethan ethan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,302
Default Re: Changes to baseball

[ QUOTE ]
Im pretty sure that the point of postseason is to crown the best team world champions (hopefully). Other sports don't have the extreme parity of baseball, and baseball should deal with this by making the series longer. I'm sure money and unions would get in the way somehow though.

[/ QUOTE ]

If we remove four games from the regular season and add two each to the DS/WS rounds you've removed 60 regular season games and added 10 postseason. That's indeed probably not good money-wise.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-28-2006, 12:11 AM
Lori Lori is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: In cyberspace, no-one can hear your sig.
Posts: 6,284
Default Re: Changes to baseball

[ QUOTE ]
Im pretty sure that the point of postseason is to crown the best team world champions (hopefully). Other sports don't have the extreme parity of baseball, and baseball should deal with this by making the series longer. I'm sure money and unions would get in the way somehow though.

[/ QUOTE ]

English soccer gets around this by having two competitions, an all-play-all league and a knockout cup. Winning the cup is awesome, but everyone knows the best team wins the league.

Soccer is pretty boring on the whole, but the setup is pretty good.

Lori
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-28-2006, 12:12 AM
agent_fish agent_fish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 810
Default Re: Changes to baseball

[ QUOTE ]
Other sports don't have the extreme parity of baseball

[/ QUOTE ]
So the Cardinals win the WS and all of a sudden there is extreme parity in baseball?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-28-2006, 12:25 AM
crockpot crockpot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: /goggles fill up with tears / oh crap hold on can\'t see anything
Posts: 4,980
Default Re: Changes to baseball

it all depends on how you define parity.

in what sport is it easiest to take a true .500 team and win the world series? baseball, by far. the cardinals are the first team since the '87 twins to win a major sports championship with .500 talent.

what sport involves the most turnover of top teams between one season and the next? almost definitely football.

what sport makes repeating championships the hardest? probably baseball. a football team is hard to keep together, but the best team wins more often in the playoffs.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.