Post deleted by Mat Sklansky

[Hattifnatt]

I call in hand 1 even if it surely looks like aces, hand 2 is an easy call for sure.

[yvesaint]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
fyi you are getting 2:1 (300:150) on your call in hand 2, AND CHECK OUT THESE NUMBERS

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

2,380,469 games 2.913 secs 817,188 games/sec

Board:
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 39.8342 % 39.62% 00.22% { QdQh }
Hand 2: 60.1658 % 59.95% 00.22% { KK+, AKs, AKo }

[/ QUOTE ]

The problem is when people present pokerstove calcuations here like they are the bible that some hands in his range are far more likly then others.

P.S. This is a clear call [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

[/ QUOTE ]

still, the range i gave was ridiculously tight for a shortstack

[Dan BRIGHT]

kall all betz

[jsnipes28]

Hand 1 is probably a good fold but I almost never make it. The fact that it is 9max can probably swing it to a fold.

Hand 2 definite insta-call. Donkeys w/ TT+ or AQo+ have no intentions of folding and are shoving a lot, easy call w/ QQ against some half-stack idiot.

[DJ Sensei]

i havent played fullring in a while, but i think i'd lean towards calling both.