#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shawne Merriman on the juice.
[ QUOTE ]
Who among us would not take steroids if it meant earning millions of dollars more than we would otherwise? [/ QUOTE ] Thing is, and I could be wrong, but given the NFL's tetsing policy and my understanding of its stringncy (word?) he's almost assured of getting caught. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shawne Merriman on the juice.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Who among us would not take steroids if it meant earning millions of dollars more than we would otherwise? [/ QUOTE ] I hope alot of us. [/ QUOTE ] I would. Sorry! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shawne Merriman on the juice.
What if teams had to forfeit games for this?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shawne Merriman on the juice.
I can't believe there isn't greater uproar when two Pro Bowlers (Merriaman and Rogers) are found guilty within one week of another.
If this happened in baseball, there would be widespread panic. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shawne Merriman on the juice.
[ QUOTE ]
I can't believe there isn't greater uproar when two Pro Bowlers (Merriaman and Rogers) are found guilty within one week of another. If this happened in baseball, there would be widespread panic. [/ QUOTE ] The fact that they're pro bowlers doesn't come close to what the juicers did to the baseball record books. If it were Favre and (insert hall of famer), fine. Since it isn't, and since the NFL has seemed to keep itself fairly clean, then this isn't that big of deal. Rogers tested positive for a supplement, supposedly. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shawne Merriman on the juice.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Who among us would not take steroids if it meant earning millions of dollars more than we would otherwise? [/ QUOTE ] I hope alot of us. [/ QUOTE ] I don't believe it for a second. Millions of dollars for doing something that won't harm anyone aside from giving you a competitive advantage over them? It's easy to take the moral high ground when we haven't been given the chance to sin. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shawne Merriman on the juice.
There is a huge difference between a competitive advantage and cheating.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shawne Merriman on the juice.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Who among us would not take steroids if it meant earning millions of dollars more than we would otherwise? [/ QUOTE ] Thing is, and I could be wrong, but given the NFL's tetsing policy and my understanding of its stringncy (word?) he's almost assured of getting caught. [/ QUOTE ]bahahaha, yeah cause the NFL polices its players more than anyother league. Dude the NFL just FRONTS. You really think these guys in the NFL just work out a lot to get big? Come on people. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shawne Merriman on the juice.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I can't believe there isn't greater uproar when two Pro Bowlers (Merriaman and Rogers) are found guilty within one week of another. If this happened in baseball, there would be widespread panic. [/ QUOTE ] The fact that they're pro bowlers doesn't come close to what the juicers did to the baseball record books. If it were Favre and (insert hall of famer), fine. Since it isn't, and since the NFL has seemed to keep itself fairly clean, then this isn't that big of deal. Rogers tested positive for a supplement, supposedly. [/ QUOTE ] You know some people consider Merriman as one of the best defensive players in the league if not the best. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Shawne Merriman on the juice.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Who among us would not take steroids if it meant earning millions of dollars more than we would otherwise? [/ QUOTE ] I hope alot of us. [/ QUOTE ] I don't believe it for a second. Millions of dollars for doing something that won't harm anyone aside from giving you a competitive advantage over them? It's easy to take the moral low ground when we're a Chargers fan [/ QUOTE ] Look, it's obvious why players do it, but that doesn't mean they're not guilty when they get caught. It's not a question of morals - it's a question of the rules of the league, and is the risk of getting caught and suspended worth the extra performance? Given the Chargers' LB situation right now, I'd probably say no. |
|
|