#1
|
|||
|
|||
10/25 NL hand--odd FossilMan comment?
This is a hand from this past Friday evening at Foxwoods--Greg was sitting two seats to my right (returning to the hometown for FARGO--good times), and not involved in the hand, but questioned my play after the hand was over.
10/25 NL, I have one of the smaller stacks at the table, approximately $3500. UTG (much larger stack than mine) limps, everyone else folds, I'm in the cutoff with [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]65. I stick in a pot-sweetener, making it $100 to go. The blinds fold, and the limper calls, leaving me heads-up. Flop is 732, rainbow with one heart. He checks, I bet $150, he calls. Turn is K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]--we both check. River is A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. My opponent bets $200. I called, showed my hand, and took it down. I didn't bother seeing what my opponent had--he disgustedly mucked. Best guess is he had a big Ace, perhaps even AK. Greg sort of nudged me a little at this point, saying something to the effect of "The Ace of Hearts was on the river? And you just called?" He seemed to think that I should have gone for some kind of raise on the end. I didn't think that there was any more value to be gotten from the hand. IMHO, a raise just kind of screams "flush", so if he can call a raise, he's going to have me beat here. OTOH, my opponent can go for the reraise with no flush, and put me to an uncomfortable decision. I indicated as much to Greg, and he said, "That's OK if he reraises, you'll just make more money." I guess he thought my opponent was so unlikely to have a hand that could beat mine, that raising was a straight out value play. So which is it? Did I chicken out and possibly miss some potential profit here? Or did I do OK to just win a modest size pot here? |
|
|