|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What is the outcome of the bet? | |||
| Person A wins |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| Person B wins |
  
|
5 | 5.49% |
| Neither person wins |
  
|
86 | 94.51% |
| Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
09-06-2006, 11:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: so let me get this new WPEX thing straight
You can't get HHs through email any longer. As far as the bonus goes, just put a 150 dollar bet on a football game this weekend. You'll be getting 10-11, plus your 30 dollar bonus, so it's easily +EV. It will also make the game alot more interesting.
|
|
#12
09-06-2006, 11:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: so let me get this new WPEX thing straight
[ QUOTE ]
You can't get HHs through email any longer. As far as the bonus goes, just put a 150 dollar bet on a football game this weekend. You'll be getting 10-11, plus your 30 dollar bonus, so it's easily +EV. It will also make the game alot more interesting. [/ QUOTE ] I tried that and went 5 for 6 last weekend on my pics!! I'm trying to lose that bonus and I just can't do it. I keep picking winners!
|
|
#13
09-06-2006, 11:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
no player names in the HH a bad decision
the software, connection trouble etc. was worth the trouble because of no rake. I doubt that it is anymore. O god...back to party I go I guess
|
|
#14
09-06-2006, 11:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: no player names in the HH a bad decision
[ QUOTE ]
the software, connection trouble etc. was worth the trouble because of no rake. I doubt that it is anymore. O god...back to party I go I guess [/ QUOTE ] I don't think they got rid of no rake. I might be wrong.
|
|
#15
09-06-2006, 11:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: so let me get this new WPEX thing straight
[ QUOTE ]
No names is by design. [/ QUOTE ] Won't this attract colluders? How do you plan to secure the integrity of the games?
|
|
#16
09-06-2006, 11:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: so let me get this new WPEX thing straight
[ QUOTE ]
I tried that and went 5 for 6 last weekend on my pics!! I'm trying to lose that bonus and I just can't do it. I keep picking winners! [/ QUOTE ] The bonus requires you to lose in order to clear it?
|
|
#17
09-06-2006, 11:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: so let me get this new WPEX thing straight
I dunno, you have to wager like 10X the bonus or something to clear it and I'm not going to lay that much action before I need the funds.
|
|
#18
09-06-2006, 11:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: so let me get this new WPEX thing straight
[ QUOTE ]
No names is by design. Ding dong, please PM me your name and I will find out why they haven't released the funds. [/ QUOTE ] Did you guys change the way rake is calculated also?
|
|
#19
09-06-2006, 11:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: so let me get this new WPEX thing straight
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] No names is by design. [/ QUOTE ] Won't this attract colluders? How do you plan to secure the integrity of the games? [/ QUOTE ] How does this attract colluders? A player looking at his hand histories soon after the hand was played will remember who each player was. Blocking out opponents names should have no effect on the player other than making it impossible to track opponents long term, and I'm sure WPX maintains records with all of the player's names intact.
|
|
#20
09-06-2006, 11:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: so let me get this new WPEX thing straight
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] No names is by design. [/ QUOTE ] Won't this attract colluders? How do you plan to secure the integrity of the games? [/ QUOTE ] I'm sure that WPEX still has the names of everyone in the hand in thier own histories. They will still be able to detect collusion as well as they ever have.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
