Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:32 PM
Ness3 Ness3 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: \"The Foul Line\"
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: Theoretically, How Deep Before I Consider Folding This?

[ QUOTE ]
The people saying fold are either a) being sarcastic b) being useless because they provide no reasons! I'm alright w/a) but b) just suxorz.

I call - if he's got all the deuces, good play.

[/ QUOTE ]

VILLAIN HAS AK!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:33 PM
OHFreak OHFreak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
Posts: 1,691
Default Re: Theoretically, How Deep Before I Consider Folding This?

Alright so it was a).

But if he DID he WOULD hit an A on the riv.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:34 PM
Three Sigma Three Sigma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 180
Default Re: Theoretically, How Deep Before I Consider Folding This?

Clearly he turned up 22 or you wouldn't be posting. There are about 45 possible hands left with a king and one hand left with 22. You have to call up to about 45 times half the pot or $600.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:38 PM
Gordon Scott Gordon Scott is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 632
Default Re: Theoretically, How Deep Before I Consider Folding This?

Call and hit your Queen on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:39 PM
Roadstar Roadstar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,441
Default Re: Theoretically, How Deep Before I Consider Folding This?

Why should we be checking turn, against a passive player with the second nuts, I'm trying to build the pot and hope to be paid off by any pocket pair 33-JJ?!

As for the considerations, I'll try to quantify this a little:

bluff freq - I say probably 5%

Combos - behind 1 combo, split with 15 combos (KQ, KJ-K9 lets say).

So 5% pick off bluff, 6% against 22, 89% chop chop

So EV = 0.05(200)[bluff], 0.89(0) [chop chop], 0.06(-100)[lose]

EV = +4 so essentially breakeven or slightly negative after rake?

I guess a bigger allin would skew the probabilities a bit more to 22?

Thoughts welcome! Thx

[ QUOTE ]
a few considerations....

opponent's bluff frequency
your odds of hitting your one-outer (if you are in fact behind)
actual pot odds (assume you are splitting)

probably somewhat results oriented but you're usually better checking the turn here - get value from hands you beat when you bet the river.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:44 PM
asherpuppy asherpuppy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 67
Default Re: Theoretically, How Deep Before I Consider Folding This?

I don't think you ever could fold this. If you think it's a chop, you would obviously call for your 50% equity on the existing pot. So the only question is comparing how often you are ahead to how often you are behind. People at this level tend to make ridiculous moves, I think it's much more likely you are ahead than behind after he pushes. He's more likely to raise a smaller amount with 22, more likely to try something really stupid like pushing with a weaker hand.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:46 PM
Roadstar Roadstar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,441
Default Re: Theoretically, How Deep Before I Consider Folding This?

O RLY? I know where the BBV forum is if I were looking to post for sympathy. And how did you get **45** combos with a king? Please do share.

[ QUOTE ]
Clearly he turned up 22 or you wouldn't be posting. There are about 45 possible hands left with a king and one hand left with 22. You have to call up to about 45 times half the pot or $600.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:48 PM
MikeyPatriot MikeyPatriot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,301
Default Re: Theoretically, How Deep Before I Consider Folding This?

D00ds, did you guys miss this hand in BBV???

Seriously, though, this is such a fast call. You'd have to be so deep that calling this would [censored] up your bankroll pretty bad.

You should be checking or check/calling the turn here because only the very worst idiots are calling without a K or 22 here. This will either get your river value bet called more often or will allow you to induce a bluff.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:55 PM
Roadstar Roadstar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,441
Default Results

Thanks for the responses - basically we're never folding is the msg! And no this wasn't a bad beat. I thought about it for like 3 seconds and called expecting to chop.

Villain shows 4 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]4 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] MHIG and says "I just didn't think you had it this time..." and leaves

I was shocked to see villain pull a move like this on such an obvious board...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-29-2006, 12:57 PM
Roadstar Roadstar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,441
Default Re: Theoretically, How Deep Before I Consider Folding This?

Spot on.

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think you ever could fold this. If you think it's a chop, you would obviously call for your 50% equity on the existing pot. So the only question is comparing how often you are ahead to how often you are behind. People at this level tend to make ridiculous moves, I think it's much more likely you are ahead than behind after he pushes. He's more likely to raise a smaller amount with 22, more likely to try something really stupid like pushing with a weaker hand.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.