Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-14-2006, 01:53 PM
tufat23 tufat23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: wafflecrushing your sister
Posts: 7,933
Default Re: put him on a hand, please (200NL)

leading or checking is fine on this flop. Mixing up your play is FINE imo. I don't like 3 betting the turn, but if you call and hit you may not get much action... [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-14-2006, 02:23 PM
Stealthy Stealthy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Contemplating life
Posts: 2,813
Default Re: put him on a hand, please (200NL)

I lead this flop almost always in a limped pot. 3 bet on turn is just horrible. Fold to the push very quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-14-2006, 02:31 PM
Albert Moulton Albert Moulton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Live Full Ring NLHE
Posts: 2,377
Default Re: put him on a hand, please (200NL)

The tight/passive-aggressive rock flopped or turned a set, or turned a straight with 67s (probably not hearts, since he might have bet the flop with an OESFD).

So, I think you can fold here. K and 8 are no longer good outs for you. You basically need to river a flush to win. That is 9 outs * 2% (estimate) = 18% or very roughly 4:1 against. The pot odds are call 138 to win 276, or 2:1. So, it's a clear fold at this point.

I think when the rock min-raises the turn, call is in order to see if you hit on the river without pairing the board. If you hit, value bet so that a set will feel obligated to call. If you miss, check/fold.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-14-2006, 02:51 PM
joseki joseki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 455
Default Re: put him on a hand, please (200NL)

[ QUOTE ]
I don't like the turn reraise.

joseki, what is your go rank?

[/ QUOTE ]

It was around 1d before I started playing poker. Haven't played a game in 2 years.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-14-2006, 03:10 PM
eviljeff eviljeff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: couching
Posts: 5,304
Default Re: put him on a hand, please (200NL)

[ QUOTE ]
I'll put my money on him having 55 or 67s and fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed. also, I think a fold is in order even if his range is a little bigger than this.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-14-2006, 03:13 PM
joseki joseki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 455
Default Re: put him on a hand, please (200NL)

Thanks for the replies.

The crux of this is what the turn min-raise means from a nit/rock/tight-passive-aggressive. I think there is almost no chance he checks the flop with a made hand. If we're to believe he has anything at all the 5 had to help, but the only hands it could help are 55 or 76, and I'd expect a bigger raise with those. So, after his min-raise, I put him on hearts or air and thought I could fold air or maybe get a bad call from JhTh or the like.

FWIW, I folded after a short pause. I still think there is a good chance he was FOS, but I do feel a bit better about it after getting such a consensus here.

Do you guys really see super-tight/somewhat-aggressive players frequently play strong hands like this? This guy is a regular in the game and I think he's probably a winner. I think guys like this make money by playing big hands strongly against the jackasses, and using their reputations to pick up pots against observant opponents. Any thoughts on that?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.