|
|
#12
08-03-2006, 08:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL500...Safety play?
[ QUOTE ]
A very tightish passive table [/ QUOTE ] why wouldn't you exploit this? garland seems to be as weak/tight as the rest of the table 
|
|
#16
08-04-2006, 11:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL500...Safety play?
[ QUOTE ]
lol @ this whole thread [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#17
08-04-2006, 01:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Results and thoughts...
Adjusting to a table full of nits is not my forte as I turn weak-tight myself. It's a leak I'm working on, but to my credit, I would probably request a table change or simply leave and find another game...even limit if that were the only place to get good action.
I felt as if I were at the Venetian all over again. God...what a horror show. Why didn't I raise preflop? I didn't mind a multi-way field being suited. If I were off-suit, I would definitely raise. Who the hell is this Leptyne character anyways? I wasn't even aware he made those posts, but I suppose it's funny anyways. No, I don't coach. Results: I forgot to mention that SB checked the flop dark. Turn ($150 pot, 6 players): 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Everyone checks to me, and how I feel that I can bet safely with $100 and take it down, but SB wakes up and min-raises me to $200. I say "you sat on a flush twice?" and fold. He showed T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. I felt that anyone here would slowplay a flush once, but if I bet the flop, I would get called by K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]x[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] along with the naked K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] alike and couldn't tell the difference and may have to commit to a lot of chips on the turn drawing possibly dead. If anyone came out firing on the flop or turn, I'd probably release the hand. Thanks for your thoughts, Garland
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
