Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:33 PM
matt2411 matt2411 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 54
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure you win them 90-95% of the time, just like the rest of us.

[/ QUOTE ]

last 2 months (100k hands) is a big enough sample size to disagree.

10k hands? pfft. 40k hands, eh, still small. 75k? good. 100k? large enough sample size to draw conclusions from.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:35 PM
numeri numeri is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: living dangerously
Posts: 1,808
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

Matt,

It's not the number of total hands. It's the number of those 90-95% favorites that matter. It still sounds like you're basing your comments on emotions and memories - not data.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:36 PM
Edge34 Edge34 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Flame Magnet
Posts: 4,830
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.



Thank you, come again!



EDIT: So you're on Ultimate...meh...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:43 PM
ghostface ghostface is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Out of control
Posts: 5,554
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

[ QUOTE ]
sorry, i'm not realistic

[/ QUOTE ]

fyp
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:48 PM
p-i p-i is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: BOOM!
Posts: 920
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

I was feeling like this all last week. I wish I could take my pot equity (even at a small discount) instead of having to play a bajillion hands.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-24-2006, 01:54 PM
otis_nixon otis_nixon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Me & Willie McGee
Posts: 634
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

You've played 100,000 hands and you are still stuck at $25 NL? Well, ummm there's your problem right there sir.

And geez you aren't winning at 25 NL this whole time? I think it's either time to invest in a coach or move to Ghana where you can be a pro at $2 NL and sending spam e-mails with Idi the Nigerian.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-24-2006, 02:04 PM
mlagoo mlagoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: confused
Posts: 12,644
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

matt2411,

ARE YOU SUGGESTING WHAT I THINK YOU'RE SUGGESTING?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-24-2006, 02:13 PM
alphatmw alphatmw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,348
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

matt, since you obviously have PT or something to track these results, show me definitive proof that over 100K hands, you're W@SD rate is 20-40% with 9-1 or better all the money going in on the flop and i'll pay you whatever your current bankroll is.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-24-2006, 02:39 PM
matt2411 matt2411 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 54
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

No, i used to be a winning NL400 player for quite awhile (worked my way up from NL25 and 10k later... i was playing NL400)

Played there for a few months, was doing well, then i got hit with the whammy. everything turned to crap, nothing held up, my won @ showdown was in the high 60s, but i was posting 3-4 losing days a week, as opposed to 1 a week to 10 days before. Nothing changed regarding my play. I had to cash out about half my roll (4.5k) and i dropped down to NL200 again with around 3.7k or something. Played there for awhile, still posting more losing sessions than winning sessions, i was losing more days t han winning, as I was winning a lot of small pots, but every big pot i was losing whether i was a 3-1 4-1 or 10-1 favorite.

this all happened as i switched to RB. I was very weary of what was happening so i switched sites. Still losing money (breaking about even with bonuses tho).

when my bonuses ran out, i started getting whittled away, slowly but surely, i made some donk decisions namely taking a shot at a higher limit, lost to a couple failed bluffs, and a few 8-1 suckouts, and redeposited for the first tie in a year.

from then on i cant seem to win at any limit because im running so ridiculously bad. the swings in my BR were ridiculously large, even playing as super tight as i was (i was something stupid like 12/4/2 at full ring.

i would have 8 Buyin swings semi regularly, always down (because of setup hands or missed draws, or just freakish suckouts) because people were calling anything and everything at NL50/NL100. and after a couple losing weeks, i decided to move back up to 2/4

so i decided i was going to play NL400 underrolled, because i can actually play poker there. well that didn;t go well. .. and i busted... again. redeposited (again), started playing 6max to exploit weaker players and play a bit looser and outplay my opponents more often and force them into making mistakes.

same deal though, i would grind away all day, winning small pots. then get all in for 200+ BB pots as a big favorite on turn/flop, and get outdrawn, and be back to even or negative on the day. that would occur a number of times, and i would be a small winner or a big loser on the day.

i stopped playing 6m last night, and switched back to full ring (with a big deposit bonus/rakeback) -- so i could play a bunch tighter, and wait for nuts/2nd nuts and reduce variance overall-- at NL25 and NL50 after losing the remainder of my roll at NL50 and NL100 in the span of 2 hours as a 5-1, 8-1, 7-1 and 19-1 favorite (4 big hands), and busted... again.

upon resuming play at full ring, i went negatively rather quickly losing 2 all in pots to runner runner, but reclaiming lost $$ that as i got my money in with the villain drawing dead.

today... about the same story. started my 1st 150 hands down 4 buyins as I lost 2 all in pots... one to runner runner, the 2nd to a 2 outer on the river. Reclaimed some of that as i got my money in with quads and flush vs made straight, and picked off a few people's all in bluffs on broken draws.

Yes, I whine. yes im a crybaby. But as far as im concerned, its my god given right to [censored] over the internet, after running ice cold (and having the worst beats/luck of my life) for 2 months straight and being a losing player even at the lowest limits, losing time and time again to the biggest donks on the planet, after being a steady winner for so long, and now not even being able to win at the lowest limits is the most frustrating thing ever.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-24-2006, 02:51 PM
los_toros los_toros is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default Re: Odds for online poker are not realistic.

W-0-W
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.