#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FullTilt Pro down 36K HU
stuart vs agen
54s vs 88 AA9 2 3 pwned |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FullTilt Pro down 36K HU
1010 vs. 44 was almost hilarious.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FullTilt Pro down 36K HU
does anyone know who agent007 is??
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FullTilt Pro down 36K HU
Has anyone else heard the rumour that Stuart Paterson is in fact an international super villian with plans for world domination?
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FullTilt Pro down 36K HU
I have heard from a very reliable source that agent007 is one of ozzy87's accounts
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FullTilt Pro down 36K HU
[ QUOTE ]
I have heard from a very reliable source that agent007 is one of ozzy87's accounts [/ QUOTE ] That's not true, I am 'agent007' on FTP. Ozzy plays on 'Ozzy 87' only. And that was not chip dumping, it was legit tilt. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FullTilt Pro down 36K HU
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I have heard from a very reliable source that agent007 is one of ozzy87's accounts [/ QUOTE ] That's not true, I am 'agent007' on FTP. Ozzy plays on 'Ozzy 87' only. And that was not chip dumping, it was legit tilt. [/ QUOTE ] nat for king of the world? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FullTilt Pro down 36K HU
If your agent007, then I apologise but I heard it from someone who plays very regularly at 50/100. Anyway nice session any idea what sent him off?
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FullTilt Pro down 36K HU
The number of avatarless new posters in this thread makes me wonder if FTP is spamming our forums. While I'm going to the work of checking IPS, are y'all being directed here by some other source of which I am unaware?
Edit to add- ok, ips don't match. You are officially not dirty spammers. Enjoy! |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: FullTilt Pro down 36K HU
[ QUOTE ]
If your agent007, then I apologise but I heard it from someone who plays very regularly at 50/100. Anyway nice session any idea what sent him off? [/ QUOTE ] I would be willing to subject my account at FTP to an IP investigation to prove that Ozzy wasn't playing. I don't know how else to prove it, but it definitely wasn't him regardless of what people say. I'm not sure if it was or was not actually Stu playing on the account. EDIT: Actually, I don't really feel like going through anything without money on the line, so I wouldn't go through with it unless there was a bet of some kind needing to prove who was playing. |
|
|