#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5 aces on stars????
[ QUOTE ]
wtf 5 aces? [/ QUOTE ] It's obviously fake. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5 aces on stars????
ace on the turn looks like it is dipped down abit..
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5 aces on stars????
Old fake.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5 aces on stars????
good catch. The turn ace definitely looks a little off-line.
Tell whoever it is to do a better job photo-shopping next time. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5 aces on stars????
Actually, it's the middle Ac that is higher than the rest. Look at it from a side angle on your monitor. Or put a ruler up to it.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5 aces on stars????
Also the popup canceling the tourney is a fake too. Doesn't look like Stars popups.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5 aces on stars????
[ QUOTE ]
Old fake. [/ QUOTE ] |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5 aces on stars????
The final table for this tournament, note who's NOT in the top 9:
PokerStars Tournament #14705493, No Limit Hold'em Buy-In: $10.00/$1.00 1059 players Total Prize Pool: $10590.00 Tournament started - 2005/11/12 - 12:00:00 (ET) Tournament finished - 2005/11/12 - 23:24:23 (ET) 1: gamblninfla (Royal Palm Beach), $2647.51 (25%) 2: MiketheKid2 (Selden), $1482.61 (14%) 3: twiceasright (Cambridge), $953.11 (9%) 4: witzy2004 (springfield), $688.36 (6.50%) 5: papp (nort olmsted), $561.28 (5.30%) 6: fishbones11 (Ottawa), $455.38 (4.30%) 7: shew80 (greenfield), $349.48 (3.30%) 8: hoff_stylee (Saint Louis), $243.58 (2.30%) 9: Skinnyville (Louisville), $158.86 (1.50%) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5 aces on stars????
As I just spent an hour on my response to someone strangely mailing in with this today.... 2 + 2 is going to eat my formatting, but you get the idea.
[ QUOTE ] Thank you for the screenshot. I've actually seen it before, it was on a public URL last time. However, this screenshot is fake. T# 14705493 was the $10 + $1 Deep Stacks tournament held on 12th November 2005. The top four players in this event were: "gamblinfla" "MiketheKid2" "twiceasright" "witzy2004" The player "Big Devin" didn't take part in this tournament. You don't just have to take my word for it, you will find confirmation on outside databases which we do not have access to. For example, if you look at http://thepokerdb.com/ for "Big Devin" or for that tournament, you'll be able to confirm that he didn't take part in it. You'll also be able to confirm that this tournament finished - there was no cancellation. So not only would we have had to edit our own database, but we'd have had to do it to several outside databases, sometimes of sites that we do not approve of and ban the use of. Next, you can see the observer "style12" in chat on the table. "style12" is not a User ID on our database - he doesn't exist. You can confirm this for yourself too. If you go to a computer that hasn't had a PokerStars account created on it already and set one up, try entering the ID "style12". It will work because it hasn't been used yet. There are also two hands mentioned here. One is # 3044245011 and the other # 3044243120. I've attached them both below to demonstrate the large number of changes we'd have to make if we removed a player from an event, and all record of the hand that took place. As you can see, the chip stacks are totally consistent from one hand to the next. Further more, "Big Devin" didn't take part. We would have had to change tens of thousands of hands to change the event in this way (as a change to a player on one table changes that of a player on another table due to table moves). Furthermore, we'd have had to changed hundreds of accounts regarding their balance, their time played, their chat and so on and so forth. Then we'd have had to changed the accounts of all the players that were on other tables shared with players in this tournament in other events. We are looking at literally millions of changes made to our database. Would it be simpler to do that, or to fix a problem that surely would have turned up dozens of times before on our site in the five billion hands we've dealt? Which explanation is more likely - that: 1. We've edited millions of entries in our database (surely an extremely complicated task to ensure that the numbers are internally consistent). 2. We've deleted a player entirely 3. We've gone in and edited the database of thepokerdb and all the other tournament stat sites that are out there, including many that don't like us very much 4. We are too lazy to fix a problem involving being dealt five aces, but work hard enough to alter millions of database entries 5. That we care so little for the integrity of the site that we'd try to do any of this Or that the screenshot is fake? This screenshot is seven months old, and yet there've been no lawsuits, no reliable forum posts, no news stories, nothing. This is because the screenshot has been photoshopped to look like we dealt five aces, when we did infact not. I hope that this sets your mind at ease, but if you have further queries, please do not hesitate to let us know. Best regards, Andrew PokerStars Support Team --- PokerStars Game #3044245011: Tournament #14705493, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level XX (10000/20000) - 2005/11/12 - 22:53:37 (ET) Table '14705493 44' Seat #4 is the button Seat 4: gamblninfla (3550492 in chips) Seat 5: twiceasright (536880 in chips) Seat 7: witzy2004 (326768 in chips) Seat 9: MiketheKid2 (880860 in chips) 22:53:37 gamblninfla: posts the ante 1000 22:53:37 twiceasright: posts the ante 1000 22:53:37 witzy2004: posts the ante 1000 22:53:37 MiketheKid2: posts the ante 1000 22:53:37 Moving Bets to Pot 22:53:37 twiceasright: posts small blind 10000 22:53:37 witzy2004: posts big blind 20000 22:53:37 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to gamblninfla [Kd Qc] 22:53:37 Dealt to witzy2004 [Ad Tc] 22:53:41 MiketheKid2: folds 22:53:42 albo [observer] said, "i took a bad beat in this tourney" 22:53:43 gamblninfla: raises 40000 to 60000 22:53:43 twiceasright: folds 22:53:46 albo [observer] said, "and it was in this table" 22:53:47 witzy2004: raises 265768 to 325768 and is all-in 22:53:49 gamblninfla: calls 265768 22:53:49 Moving Bets to Pot 22:53:53 *** FLOP *** [5s Ks 4d] 22:53:53 glarnex [observer] said, "qk" 22:53:58 glarnex [observer] said, "3" 22:53:59 *** TURN *** [5s Ks 4d] [3s] 22:54:01 glarnex [observer] said, "7" 22:54:02 *** RIVER *** [5s Ks 4d 3s] [Kc] 22:54:05 *** SHOW DOWN *** witzy2004: shows [Ad Tc] (a pair of Kings) 22:54:05 gamblninfla: shows [Kd Qc] (three of a kind, Kings) 22:54:06 bighuurt11 [observer] said, "700 for you" 22:54:07 gamblninfla collected 665536 from pot 22:54:08 Dolemite42 [observer] said, "nh" 22:54:08 albo [observer] said, "finished 108" 22:54:08 twiceasright said, "gg" 22:54:09 glarnex [observer] said, "im good" *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 665536 | Rake 0 Board [5s Ks 4d 3s Kc] Seat 4: gamblninfla (button) showed [Kd Qc] and won (665536) with three of a kind, Kings Seat 5: twiceasright (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 7: witzy2004 (big blind) showed [Ad Tc] and lost with a pair of Kings Seat 9: MiketheKid2 folded before Flop (didn't bet) PokerStars Game #3044243120: Tournament #14705493, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level XX (10000/20000) - 2005/11/12 - 22:53:25 (ET) Table '14705493 44' Seat #9 is the button Seat 4: gamblninfla (3561492 in chips) Seat 5: twiceasright (523880 in chips) Seat 7: witzy2004 (327768 in chips) Seat 9: MiketheKid2 (881860 in chips) 22:53:25 gamblninfla: posts the ante 1000 22:53:25 twiceasright: posts the ante 1000 22:53:25 witzy2004: posts the ante 1000 22:53:25 MiketheKid2: posts the ante 1000 22:53:25 Moving Bets to Pot 22:53:25 gamblninfla: posts small blind 10000 22:53:25 twiceasright: posts big blind 20000 22:53:25 *** HOLE CARDS *** 22:53:27 witzy2004: folds 22:53:28 gamblninfla said, "not a chance hon..lmao" 22:53:29 MiketheKid2: folds 22:53:30 gamblninfla: folds 22:53:30 Moving Bets to Pot 22:53:33 twiceasright collected 24000 from pot 22:53:35 twiceasright: doesn't show hand *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 24000 | Rake 0 Seat 4: gamblninfla (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 5: twiceasright (big blind) collected (24000) Seat 7: witzy2004 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 9: MiketheKid2 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) [/ QUOTE ] |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 5 aces on stars????
Oh, and this was part of a thread, so I'm referring back a bit, but you get the idea.
|
|
|