|
|
#11
06-05-2006, 10:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Flop play
[ QUOTE ]
The turn cap shows a pretty fundimental misunderstanding of pot equity. Why the forum advocates it is beyond me. [/ QUOTE ] Am I missing something? Only 1 hand beats him at that point.... 89. And 89 isn't 3-betting that flop, is it? 
|
|
#12
06-05-2006, 10:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Flop play
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The turn cap shows a pretty fundimental misunderstanding of pot equity. Why the forum advocates it is beyond me. [/ QUOTE ] Am I missing something? Only 1 hand beats him at that point.... 89. And 89 isn't 3-betting that flop, is it? [/ QUOTE ] Dont forget 44, 66, and 77, all of which may have 3-bet flop. 55 doesn't 3-bet flop, but now also has you beat.
|
|
#13
06-05-2006, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Flop play
if the villain has a set on the flop, he has 10 outs to beat us on the river... 10/44 = 22.7% chance of winning.
If the villain has 2 pair, then the guy has 4 outs, which obviously didn't complete on the river. If the villain has 85 we tie, if he has 53, we win. I think not capping the turn would be a bad thing.
|
|
#14
06-05-2006, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Flop play
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The turn cap shows a pretty fundimental misunderstanding of pot equity. Why the forum advocates it is beyond me. [/ QUOTE ] Am I missing something? Only 1 hand beats him at that point.... 89. And 89 isn't 3-betting that flop, is it? [/ QUOTE ] MP1 didn't 3-bet the flop. We could be getting freerolled as well.
|
|
#15
06-05-2006, 10:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Flop play
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] The turn cap shows a pretty fundimental misunderstanding of pot equity. Why the forum advocates it is beyond me. [/ QUOTE ] Am I missing something? Only 1 hand beats him at that point.... 89. And 89 isn't 3-betting that flop, is it? [/ QUOTE ] MP1 didn't 3-bet the flop. We could be getting freerolled as well. [/ QUOTE ] oh [censored] I misread the board... [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] my bad.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
