Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-13-2006, 12:23 PM
diebitter diebitter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Married With Children
Posts: 24,596
Default Re: I think this is the avatar chick people went nuts over last year..

[ QUOTE ]
How NSFW is it? I'm tempted to open, but don't want to reap potential consequences. Is there nudity?

(Seriously we need a better NSFW system. Half of the NSFW stuff is tame, the other half is like hardcore porn).

[/ QUOTE ]

Agree. How about:

NSFW = anything a little racy that doesn't show nips or bush, or isn't revolting - think of it this way, would you want your boss to see you looking at it at lunchtime?
VNSFW = everything else except hardcore or revolting
XNSFW = hardcore or revolting

I think the NSFW is important to retain for all levels. The important thing is consideration for others.

And OP - best to put the NSFW in the link title, not the subject. Only in the subject if the pic is embedded in the page.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-13-2006, 12:29 PM
Patrick del Poker Grande Patrick del Poker Grande is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sciencing Rockets
Posts: 9,999
Default Re: I think this is the avatar chick people went nuts over last year..

NSFW Alizée?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-13-2006, 12:29 PM
blinden84 blinden84 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Junko a Wino
Posts: 2,138
Default Re: I think this is the avatar chick people went nuts over last year..

Yeah, I think the system should also included a tag in the subject to say if we are going to be blasted with NSFW material when we open the thread, or if we click on a link within the thread...

NSWF vs NSFW Linked.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-14-2006, 09:19 AM
diebitter diebitter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Married With Children
Posts: 24,596
Default Re: I think this is the avatar chick people went nuts over last year..

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How NSFW is it? I'm tempted to open, but don't want to reap potential consequences. Is there nudity?

(Seriously we need a better NSFW system. Half of the NSFW stuff is tame, the other half is like hardcore porn).

[/ QUOTE ]

Agree. How about:

NSFW = anything a little racy that doesn't show nips or bush, or isn't revolting - think of it this way, would you want your boss to see you looking at it at lunchtime?
VNSFW = everything else except hardcore or revolting
XNSFW = hardcore or revolting

I think the NSFW is important to retain for all levels. The important thing is consideration for others.

And OP - best to put the NSFW in the link title, not the subject. Only in the subject if the pic is embedded in the page.

[/ QUOTE ]

Changed my mind here. I think the alternative naming convention below works better, as so many people are used to NSFW, it's gonna have a mix of hardcore and softer under NSFW for a while, so i'ts wise to assume the worst if you see 'NSFW'. So howabout:

MNSFW = (M=mildly) = anything a little racy that doesn't show nips or bush, or isn't revolting - think of it this way, would you want your boss to see you looking at it at lunchtime? Probably not, but it isn't tooo embarrassing.
VNSFW = everything else except hardcore or revolting
NSFW = hardcore or revolting
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-14-2006, 09:43 AM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: I think this is the avatar chick people went nuts over last year..

uh, why not just say "hot chicks" or "hardcore"?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-14-2006, 09:55 AM
MelK MelK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 917
Default Re: I think this is the avatar chick people went nuts over last year..

Attach a visual warning:







[img]http://groups.msn.com/_Secure/0RQDrAhUVleO5INdXpsri7oIljnb1R3uf7x*WcZ0kZIMu54rBe BiSG*3YyACM7D3ndOFbVTsOTiVNsKxL9qibkTaJ7h50Fe2Zh03 O2ZKqid4/mul.GIF[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-14-2006, 11:02 AM
GAL GAL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: bigg market, friday night
Posts: 565
Default Re: I think this is the avatar chick people went nuts over last year..

My god, how stupid am I? I've been on this forum for a while now and I always thought NSFW was nice stuff for wanking
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-14-2006, 11:08 AM
TheGame1020 TheGame1020 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: hee hawing it up
Posts: 441
Default Re: I think this is the avatar chick people went nuts over last year..

Well, it is. I guess.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-14-2006, 11:55 AM
J-Lo J-Lo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Chicago burbs
Posts: 1,470
Default Re: I think this is the avatar chick people went nuts over last year..

[ QUOTE ]
My god, how stupid am I? I've been on this forum for a while now and I always thought NSFW was nice stuff for wanking

[/ QUOTE ]

rofl, that's hilarious, that actually made me LOL.... jebus... and LOL= laugh out loud [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-14-2006, 03:47 PM
man man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: infinite posts-to-knowledge ratio
Posts: 2,931
Default Re: I think this is the avatar chick people went nuts over last year..

GAL, are you a woman?

if so, why do you have boobs in your avatar, ma'am?

if not, why is your name gal, dude?

puzzled,

man
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.