NoRakeWOOHOO (open letter)

[MyMindIsGoing]

[ QUOTE ]
WPEX is rigged

[/ QUOTE ]

*sigh*

[Webster]

PT support for WPEX is the worst thing they could have done. It's to bad!

[HesseJam]

[ QUOTE ]
PT support for WPEX is the worst thing they could have done. It's to bad!

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, this was actually an incentive to play there.

[Mitternacht]

WPEX actually had nothing to do with the decision other than not outlawing it. PokertrackerPat offered support, but you still have to go through and request your hands 100 at a time to import. So whether you think PT support is good or bad, you cannot lay the blame upon WPEX for it.

[MyMindIsGoing]

[ QUOTE ]
WPEX actually had nothing to do with the decision other than not outlawing it. PokertrackerPat offered support, but you still have to go through and request your hands 100 at a time to import. So whether you think PT support is good or bad, you cannot lay the blame upon WPEX for it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually they can by saying the do not allow such tools there and do not support exporting of logs. Pat would accept this I assume. What people fail to realise is that such tools (remember, no PT support = no GT+/PAhud support) is not good for the long term health of poker. It simply gives the good player a too great edge.

I currently play at a site that PAhud does not support and the games are soft, and I can assure you that once the PAhud supports it that games will be harder.

And yes I do own PAhud and I regret every minute buying it. Not so much for the money but for what it does to the games.

[DING-DONG YO]

I must respectfully disagree.

Those who use PT/PA as a crutch will end up paying for it in the end. Nothing will make up for reading the action and hands.

I wish everyone had PT/PA to be honest with you. More people misuse it than use it well.

And I beleive you can be a winning (or losing) player with almost any stats.

And long live the hijack!!!!!

[primetime32]

[ QUOTE ]


Actually they can by saying the do not allow such tools there and do not support exporting of logs. Pat would accept this I assume. What people fail to realise is that such tools (remember, no PT support = no GT+/PAhud support) is not good for the long term health of poker. It simply gives the good player a too great edge.

I currently play at a site that PAhud does not support and the games are soft, and I can assure you that once the PAhud supports it that games will be harder.

And yes I do own PAhud and I regret every minute buying it. Not so much for the money but for what it does to the games.

[/ QUOTE ]

I play at stars, PP, full tilt and WPEX and i have to consider these games anything but tight, despite the fact that they allow PT. There are ton of tables to choose from amongst these sites, if you can't find a good table with bad players from that list there is something seriously wrong with your game selection.

[ColdCaller]

[ QUOTE ]
And yes I do own PAhud and I regret every minute buying it. Not so much for the money but for what it does to the games.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you regret giving yourself a bigger edge in the games? What, do you feel bad for the other players?

Genius thinking.

[LinusKS]

[ QUOTE ]
The funny thing is he's not even a winning player himself

[/ QUOTE ]

They never are.

You don't even need to look at their stats to know they're losers.

[jman220]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The funny thing is he's not even a winning player himself

[/ QUOTE ]

They never are.

You don't even need to look at their stats to know they're losers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Eh, I agree that most aren't winners, but there are plenty of pros even who are table captains (P Helmuth springs to mind, but also Matusow (although I guess arguing over whether or not he can be considered a long term winner because he's always busto is debateable)).