|
|
#11
04-30-2006, 07:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10/20 sets are maybe not so great
Is overbetting the flop retarded? I honestly have no idea, I'm just switching from limit to NL.
-If you're behind on the flop you're stacking off somehow regardless, so in this case your bet size is pretty irrelevant. -By betting 450 you let a flush or straight draw profitably call you unless you're willing to fold to scare cards on the turn. Against a larger bet a big draw would likely get it all in on the flop or otherwise fold, both of which are preferable to betting 450 and being called by an 8 out hand. -AK//AA much more likely to fold to overbet? I have no idea. This may be decisive, since these are such a large segment of his range given the cards visible so getting value from them is important. I think I like betting 900 here, or at least the full pot. Is there a reason 450 is better? 
|
|
#12
04-30-2006, 10:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 sets are maybe not so great
you bet it and take your lumps if you are beat. if you are you only have about 500 bucks the worst of it and if you are wrong and he has two pair or something and calls you will be glad you did
|
|
#13
04-30-2006, 12:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 sets are maybe not so great
gonna disagree with Ray here. I think you check call. I think you have to pay off if you are beaten here. However, by shifting to check call mode, you are more likely to induce a bluff. If you bet it, he folds two pair type hands.
|
|
#14
04-30-2006, 01:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 sets are maybe not so great
[ QUOTE ]
gonna disagree with Ray here. I think you check call. I think you have to pay off if you are beaten here. However, by shifting to check call mode, you are more likely to induce a bluff. If you bet it, he folds two pair type hands. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#19
04-30-2006, 03:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 sets are maybe not so great
If you check and he checks behind, what is your river plan?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
